From 30iq2SwoJBv4y0usoinxoymsgor.iusruphgtmuumrkmxu0vy.ius@groups.bounces.google.com Fri Apr 02 10:35:42 2010 Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <30iq2SwoJBv4y0usoinxoymsgor.iusruphgtmuumrkmxu0vy.ius@groups.bounces.google.com>) id 1NxkmO-0006Ab-NK for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:35:42 -0700 Received: by vws5 with SMTP id 5sf2507225vws.16 for ; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:35:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:received:message-id:subject:to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=1POlqIgpd2O58ejAqxZPyjaf3PDpJRRhvIstHFXdlsQ=; b=5IgjuU7Kt+ts1pYGZMqyU4owIRJoCNR1QJpRo3+ypTywlKBhcwsWOicgHFOYVdwFke NM+Gijg4KXU4XbOiV4t2TrceGYu+w5hkfH23CN5efWnGY0vgI+64bQKsqitlDHPrCpHa bdfa97idiLzeeEZ8nGHTekzHP6By/sZVVXY4Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=iu1pGFzWw0bT7e1zRnDEJwu+akaTMm7WZg6FYZ4LH1G13mzvJRDAH7LDxKoM04c4iJ 9OIA+hT58pukFH4ZabS5lzGlm13yXHZngaCqkjvVtVA51T363yHWZGwjVTcjRry3ez4c fUNmBEgDJaBilap+cLGna3ZxP3N2Bf/ieYHqc= Received: by 10.220.121.155 with SMTP id h27mr218544vcr.54.1270229714952; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:35:14 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.47.17 with SMTP id l17ls616779vcf.5.p; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:35:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.99.148 with SMTP id u20mr573494vcn.18.1270229713744; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:35:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.99.148 with SMTP id u20mr573493vcn.18.1270229713700; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:35:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-gw0-f52.google.com (mail-gw0-f52.google.com [74.125.83.52]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 25si22448586vws.0.2010.04.02.10.35.12; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:35:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of suomichris@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.83.52; Received: by gwb17 with SMTP id 17so1384418gwb.39 for ; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:35:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.5.20 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 10:34:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Christopher Doty Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 10:34:44 -0700 Received: by 10.101.4.27 with SMTP id g27mr6136533ani.221.1270229704605; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:35:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Summary: Cultural fu'ivla To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of suomichris@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=suomichris@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: suomichris@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: X-Thread-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/t/6edf3f52e6f491ba X-Message-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/msg/9c2a7c93e3a008f Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=005045015fd75497cc04834466e2 --005045015fd75497cc04834466e2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 19:54, MorphemeAddict wrote: > Has anyone ever said that individual words shouldn't be culturally biased, > e.g., your example of "portugala/portugese"? I have only ever heard that > the *language *shouldn't be culturally biased. > I keep trying to respond to this, but I'm not sure what you mean. If the bias doesn't come from words, their sources, and their meanings, where do you see it coming from? Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --005045015fd75497cc04834466e2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 19:54, MorphemeAddict <lytlesw@gmail.com> wrote:
Has anyone ever said that individual words shouldn't be culturally= biased, e.g., your example of "portugala/portugese"?=A0 I have o= nly ever heard that the language shouldn't be culturally biase= d.

I keep trying to respond to this, but I= 9;m not sure what you mean. =A0If the bias doesn't come from words, the= ir sources, and their meanings, where do you see it coming from?

Chris

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--005045015fd75497cc04834466e2--