From lojban+bncCN673cmqFBCao4jfBBoEwU44mw@googlegroups.com Wed May 05 17:47:48 2010 Received: from mail-gy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O9pFf-0004pX-RL; Wed, 05 May 2010 17:47:47 -0700 Received: by gyd5 with SMTP id 5sf4824710gyd.16 for ; Wed, 05 May 2010 17:47:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:received:x-vr-score :x-authority-analysis:x-cm-score:message-id:date:from:user-agent :x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=RZPEUt43cL9J1OpMvx2TwlDmigA6CkVrkDtOdB3UASY=; b=IZavdtaaYo93NDwTSFVRKmAuMIqOomsmsiogoP+GaLDfUWnh5MAV9lruMOacd0OLLK reUMMz4CpVvRmqlRxB2Dvbrl/WddvdLwUiqn3VlSwqvrnTZ1XjexqKFPfblWJy/oK5SK swoHB9AnkiI7/AvMIWxsU28f9Ssrq5B9XpAe8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-vr-score:x-authority-analysis:x-cm-score :message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=MPeMAm8kkpUSaRDvlrOVpLVqUMLB+AlaakOCc+z0tkB0/hX+zsXF6a86TBm+Krmlbu AYxigD/90Wg0B7PzxfQW723HjAxZH8j4xiaDJjrRYXPQjFzDxAUFiPHLS0wUEk5n4jwO 7hCmHd/F6w7Tg57xmuUcl7UGOsnyYoB+7yIYg= Received: by 10.101.136.18 with SMTP id o18mr643391ann.46.1273106842010; Wed, 05 May 2010 17:47:22 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.182.21 with SMTP id j21ls3053573anp.1.p; Wed, 05 May 2010 17:47:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.206.24 with SMTP id i24mr145644anq.38.1273106841053; Wed, 05 May 2010 17:47:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.206.24 with SMTP id i24mr145643anq.38.1273106841031; Wed, 05 May 2010 17:47:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmmtao101.cox.net (eastrmmtao101.cox.net [68.230.240.7]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id d7si690595anb.1.2010.05.05.17.47.20; Wed, 05 May 2010 17:47:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 68.230.240.7 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) client-ip=68.230.240.7; Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20100506004720.HKQX14747.eastrmmtao101.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 20:47:20 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([70.187.225.124]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id E0nL1e0082hfrC6020nLcb; Wed, 05 May 2010 20:47:20 -0400 X-VR-Score: -100.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=FnQQhIGgoxKy895ni2P06Ys7q26b/tysl77b0NRG5XA= c=1 sm=1 a=lTnEy8ucIPgA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=lsg66w07okjF3vGJL2g+Jw==:17 a=D-JfnPGBR8VaueWNAhYA:9 a=qWc9nRvjuo_lR3Py4aOgQSlU1qUA:4 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=lsg66w07okjF3vGJL2g+Jw==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <4BE21192.5090804@lojban.org> Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 20:47:14 -0400 From: Robert LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Comparison to Ilaksh? References: In-Reply-To: X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 68.230.240.7 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) smtp.mail=lojbab@lojban.org X-Original-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Danny Piccirillo wrote: > Just wondering how lojban compares to Ilaksh. I've even never heard of Ilaksh, and I don't think it has ever been mentioned in any Lojban discussion (though I haven't read everything the last few years). From the Wiki entry for the language, and the link to the author's description, I would say that there is almost nothing comparable about the two languages. Indeed, I can't imagine a language much more different from Lojban. lojbab -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.