From lojban+bncCKv97aq_GRD1g43gBBoELGFXEQ@googlegroups.com Sun May 30 21:58:50 2010 Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OIx5G-0003Dj-1l; Sun, 30 May 2010 21:58:48 -0700 Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26sf1218693wwf.16 for ; Sun, 30 May 2010 21:58:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=PvUA1+96twaXygfbsd1TWULr5eEJxsvfzMtrcuh+Zr4=; b=pwPGmL5cChSSoZUsVJcl/MYMQ5nxArKCbfRAN4ieOr/Q6OcLJSuZ8EP3q+BK8Lz8gE IhjmkBoekD2DwOSJ8t/AZfzSmqPQM4nxDFx1ia2IaeslVwgHrC6anfadzjarBFR+D9Ws 9L6YnuDz1UGrK0aTZrLgDKAoUJUJ0sKrKQl/0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=4XmSgerzPJNzzjm/RLBV05Xlu2eAQODvQA+kylicWgpdPYKzMqCf/vl+dU8wx99T18 rpt3r1CVOFYQMAFMh5Gdqj8T8S04WF15yU4T6nLzSjirTq12SEimMj+fF7jhALXtmaaQ P1awIWk/rTDMh96Fl+pu85+R2iehCoL6NngRc= Received: by 10.223.4.202 with SMTP id 10mr117291fas.47.1275281909674; Sun, 30 May 2010 21:58:29 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.86.126.32 with SMTP id y32ls935129fgc.0.p; Sun, 30 May 2010 21:58:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.87.40.24 with SMTP id s24mr365339fgj.3.1275281908225; Sun, 30 May 2010 21:58:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.87.40.24 with SMTP id s24mr365338fgj.3.1275281908196; Sun, 30 May 2010 21:58:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f52.google.com (mail-fx0-f52.google.com [209.85.161.52]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id g17si5493684fai.6.2010.05.30.21.58.27; Sun, 30 May 2010 21:58:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lamelnyk@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.52; Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so1858801fxm.25 for ; Sun, 30 May 2010 21:58:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.237.8 with SMTP id k8mr1546637muh.41.1275281906970; Sun, 30 May 2010 21:58:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.117.11 with HTTP; Sun, 30 May 2010 21:58:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1275230910.1511.5.camel@gumri> Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 07:58:26 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Named multiples From: Oleksii Melnyk To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lamelnyk@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lamelnyk@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: lamelnyk@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636416db70db0020487dcb5d4 --001636416db70db0020487dcb5d4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 But what is the profit? We are exchanging the shorter "la lindar darlu" (now needs an additional terminator/cu) for the shorter "named X type-of Y" type of selbri. Which case are you considering the most common/frequent/usable? Which one deserves to be "shorter"? -- mu'o mi'e lex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --001636416db70db0020487dcb5d4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable But what is the profit? We are exchanging the shorter "la lindar darlu= " (now needs an additional terminator/cu) for the shorter "named= X type-of Y" type of selbri. Which case are you considering the most = common/frequent/usable? Which one deserves to be "shorter"?

--
mu'o mi'e lex

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--001636416db70db0020487dcb5d4--