From lojban+bncCJfMh_WeEBCxq7rgBBoEvUWCxA@googlegroups.com Tue Jun 08 12:11:02 2010 Received: from mail-yx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.213.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OM4CP-0005hF-4i; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:11:01 -0700 Received: by yxd39 with SMTP id 39sf5150982yxd.16 for ; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:10:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received:received-spf:received:received:received :message-id:x-ymail-osg:received:x-mailer:date:from:to:mime-version :x-spam_score:x-spam_score_int:x-spam_bar:x-spam_report :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :subject:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=+XW/zhhix8qnwpwxARFgnG0HF+gt9PEBjkFvuQwZo98=; b=sG1D8Ra+C9UEPvuQTipk1n/D4gaQQwRcswux3TVC33NBmZ2fn9eHplWL6eHZB3XsdQ 4+vrNmy6bnMScGwtNGTflNTdFjEQaa7/FzIBxxEudhC5AtblONHsmwkeTif8mNPRs37V 648WqcYfmhzefZQRI/4pKpdxZW6evqwAmK6LA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:x-ymail-osg:x-mailer:date:from :to:mime-version:x-spam_score:x-spam_score_int:x-spam_bar :x-spam_report:x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender :reply-to:subject:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; b=shtiJjyJjQ+vUeBWHhbuXx73AzfH3sN3+yPdLmClXFf26wGD8yVIn2UoPDa4U41ddP NGHuX6m8TRWetF/DeDdv4vj/gG/Kp0xjmE219wuyzvoWsP9+II0Ag8aIkt5Zh7Wo7nFy 5TE8pGKcr1DOxoOBIW0eEkHh3vVGrxVHF5dq4= Received: by 10.150.161.3 with SMTP id j3mr979145ybe.28.1276024241339; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:10:41 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.150.247.33 with SMTP id u33ls3881869ybh.4.p; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:10:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.104.20 with SMTP id b20mr1032933ybc.15.1276024240168; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:10:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.248.7 with SMTP id v7mr1498597wah.18.1276024158278; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:09:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.248.7 with SMTP id v7mr1498596wah.18.1276024158235; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:09:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org (chain.digitalkingdom.org [64.81.66.169]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id e19si9209127wam.0.2010.06.08.12.09.16; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:09:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of nobody@digitalkingdom.org designates 64.81.66.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=64.81.66.169; Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OM4Al-0005XW-M7 for lojban@googlegroups.com; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:09:16 -0700 Received: from web53302.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.49.92]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OM4Ah-0005Wt-Ur for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:09:15 -0700 Received: (qmail 97605 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Jun 2010 19:09:04 -0000 Message-ID: <531942.95855.qm@web53302.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: k25KQf4VM1kdm6nO4TBZZeHISekgzdjpylkpiHPBr5R9MlZ glXmV_HcmM.ZBhrhBHiXv.A_SLwmQ1LuqGxLxX1hbMQBqAyWJW6J6ELHE39a MrKKlFo2atjE9DHCvcu3En.tJ255gpyww32n1Js6ZhKet_9.lyJVJGG0iSwq BbjlFNSf6FrmRMHB62mQN2SctTk2lT0y1ikwVwxDGRPPAIy3UY_xxoekkJXs GIOki62a54EH2OZtmT1yJgRCbJjoYlDacTMcjNVofOapZ6Ww0MRVk76C22UP KqwXjtnvLQgw5pW7.DwlYx9s.OnA- Received: from [174.70.58.119] by web53302.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:09:04 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/397.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.103.269680 Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:09:04 -0700 (PDT) From: jamie bechtel To: lojban-list@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam_score: 1.4 X-Spam_score_int: 14 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello all. I've begun looking into Lojban (and Loglan), and if this is the appropriate place to do so, I'll be asking questions here... If I say "le bajra" several times in an utterance, I assume that each instance is normally interpreted as having the same reference (i.e. I'm probably talking about only one runner). Is there a curt/simple way to indicate that I'm talking about a new/different runner (eg. "the runner spoke to the runner about the runner")? [...] Content analysis details: (1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is freemail (jamie6297[at]yahoo.com) -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [206.190.49.92 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.6 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (jamie6297[at]yahoo.com) -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0068] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of nobody@digitalkingdom.org designates 64.81.66.169 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nobody@digitalkingdom.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com X-Original-Sender: jamie6297@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: [lojban] Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-968146560-1276024144=:95855" X-Spam_score: 1.9 X-Spam_score_int: 19 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello all. I've begun looking into Lojban (and Loglan), and if this is the appropriate place to do so, I'll be asking questions here... If I say "le bajra" several times in an utterance, I assume that each instance is normally interpreted as having the same reference (i.e. I'm probably talking about only one runner). Is there a curt/simple way to indicate that I'm talking about a new/different runner (eg. "the runner spoke to the runner about the runner")? [...] Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.8 SINGLE_HEADER_2K A single header contains 2K-3K characters 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is freemail (jamie6297[at]yahoo.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL --0-968146560-1276024144=:95855 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello all. I've begun looking into Lojban (and Loglan), and if this is the= appropriate place to do so, I'll be asking questions here... If I say "le bajra" several times in an utterance, I assume that each insta= nce is normally interpreted as having the same reference (i.e. I'm probably= talking about only one runner). Is there a curt/simple way to indicate th= at I'm talking about a new/different runner (eg. "the runner spoke to the r= unner about the runner")? Loglan "le", and in some places Lojban "le" is described as analogous to th= e English definite article (i.e. "le bajra" means the particular runner tha= t I have in mind). Elsewhere, "le/lo" are distinguished by whether or not = "the runner" really is a runner, or merely something that I casually choose= to call a runner (correct?). Are both of these interpretations of "le" co= rrect? And if "lo" can only mean "that which is most definitely a...", und= er what circumstances would I use it? All that I can think of is "a man wa= lks into a bar...", and other such jokes. It looks to me like there's no r= eal indefinite article, and that "le" is going to be used much more than "l= o". Not that that looks like a problem to me. I just want to be sure that= I have a clear understanding of gadri. I believe that "le mi cutci", and "le cutci pe le bajra" are legitimate, co= rrect? Can one also say "le cutci pe mi"? Can one say "le mi pe bajra"?? Attitude indicators seem to follow rather than precede the words that they = modify. Why do they differ in this way from other Lojban words? Thanks for your time and attention. -jamie =20 --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --0-968146560-1276024144=:95855 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello all. =A0I've begun looking into L= ojban (and Loglan), and if this is the appropriate place to do so, I'll be = asking questions here...

If I say "le bajra" several tim= es in an utterance, I assume that each instance is normally interpreted as = having the same reference (i.e. I'm probably talking about only one runner). =A0Is th= ere a curt/simple way to indicate that I'm talking about a new/different ru= nner (eg. "the runner spoke to the runner about the runner")?
Loglan "le", and in some places Lojban "le" is described as ana= logous to the English definite article (i.e. "le bajra" means the particula= r runner that I have in mind). =A0Elsewhere, "le/lo" are distinguished by w= hether or not "the runner" really is a runner, or merely something that I c= asually choose to call a runner (correct?). =A0Are both of these interpreta= tions of "le" correct? =A0And if "lo" can only mean "that which is most def= initely a...", under what circumstances would I use it? =A0All that I can t= hink of is=A0"a man walks into a bar...", and other such jokes. =A0It looks= to me like there's no real indefinite article, and that "le" is going to b= e used much more than "lo". =A0Not that that looks like a problem to me. = =A0I just want to be sure that I have a clear understanding of gadri.

I believe that "le mi cutci", and "le cutci pe le bajra" ar= e legitimate, correct? =A0Can one also say "le cutci pe mi"? =A0Can one say= "le mi pe bajra"??

Attitude indicators seem to fo= llow rather than precede the words that they modify. =A0Why do they differ = in this way from other Lojban words?

Thanks for yo= ur time and attention.

-jamie

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0-968146560-1276024144=:95855--