From lojban+bncCNf8pM-bDBD0wL7hBBoEVuW16w@googlegroups.com Sat Jul 03 13:41:38 2010 Received: from mail-yx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.213.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OV9Wo-0007I3-Sp; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:41:38 -0700 Received: by yxt3 with SMTP id 3sf6532840yxt.16 for ; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:41:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received :sender:received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=tDJbnW9bG2WVTZ5LulW7YGX1iUCnpf+VON8s+4JxUXs=; b=1vXBLWy3GzXuO9woUIo0MpqE2FtQVDb9wJEYCBlX/gUHAQsIdb8n0XiJEP7cynWl1b WHKTI/lIG/BlnLaxTKOmWdPfYSF2RDM++qe7EsJUfkbQzKfrtR+b6WgzQILnrHlp8t29 j/FztJGM83ZSz+oP2Xrr4CdA6bq6ffZ9v1ktI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=DXJu/nbFtBvqrZvCRjmPghx8VqGJ+ybASC03ObbCb9H/i1K4cU4Fcr9UnO0dTfF4Mg wgeJd+mLJqflT7ICTbzhstovToYxe4CnsixFc08rLEkElBHnHADtBiFajUHaoG13Dlyh jxp6QB3+WrgV7csukLhedaUx/xOHqLbDuMSYE= Received: by 10.90.113.2 with SMTP id l2mr73876agc.8.1278189684216; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:41:24 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.90.20.26 with SMTP id 26ls327360agt.1.p; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:41:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.51.8 with SMTP id y8mr751303agy.7.1278189683515; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:41:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.129.83 with SMTP id n19mr67812wbs.14.1278189221618; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:33:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.129.83 with SMTP id n19mr67811wbs.14.1278189221580; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:33:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id u3si2330408wbb.3.2010.07.03.13.33.40; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:33:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of paskios@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.53; Received: by wwb31 with SMTP id 31so714332wwb.10 for ; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:33:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.157.201 with SMTP id c9mr801149wbx.20.1278189220429; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:33:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.86.201 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 13:33:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C2F8E31.3070909@perpetuum-immobile.de> References: <4C2F430F.4070003@perpetuum-immobile.de> <20100703170212.GZ23879@digitalkingdom.org> <4C2F8E31.3070909@perpetuum-immobile.de> Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 21:33:40 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Roleplaying in Cantr From: tijlan To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: paskios@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of paskios@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=paskios@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163646cfae708142048a819e37 --00163646cfae708142048a819e37 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 3 July 2010 20:23, Timo Paulssen wrote: > On 07/03/2010 07:02 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > In Lojban, though, you'd do: > > > > .i do mo sei mi cisma > > > > which does not have that problem. > > > Honestly I always thought it'd be > > .i do mo sei cisma > > which I find most elegant. > But is it clear enough? My gut feeling is that {cisma} likes {do} as its x1. It could mean "What's up, you're smiling." mu'o mi'e tijlan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --00163646cfae708142048a819e37 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 3 July 2010 20:23, Timo Paulssen <timonator@perp= etuum-immobile.de> wrote:
On 07/03/2010 07:02 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> In Lojban, though, you'd do:
>
> =A0 .i do mo sei mi cisma
>
> which does not have that problem.
>
Honestly I always thought it'd be

=A0.i do mo sei cisma

which I find most elegant.

But is it clear enough?= My gut feeling is that {cisma} likes {do} as its x1. It could mean "W= hat's up, you're smiling."

mu'o mi'e tijlan

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--00163646cfae708142048a819e37--