From lojban+bncCNf8pM-bDBDE9J3iBBoE7eMgng@googlegroups.com Wed Jul 21 15:53:25 2010 Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ObiA0-0007pR-It; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:53:24 -0700 Received: by gxk22 with SMTP id 22sf16117554gxk.16 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:53:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received :sender:received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=ornFIUwDtSjafSfo4Re7KoLPJ76pi2c0RP0z4ahlZw8=; b=wUBVEkAvo6hhB4mXZGQXrCV2OtJc8n9/EYV/A6IwG6pEjDQ8H+pwT6CgzS+7jZiBsT BxMKs5fbvmdM5pIswHKOUD2+Zdh4dnwrTWWZ3YcTg1jUwmk21DaRooDdAlFQAHs9P2Fw 67/QJxN4+ScI3OAp3altg+6Jbd9qxdeSWV94A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=BXXhRq9NtZ1wTLvhEy9BOzDIkrIlBSyqJohXRSpi0zK5jJRmVq/FCWEwCznuPfYiiJ jRL/nDI4YjjF+BFd5tAyWXP2nfwnOTmuSuohllqnoYLTc3rmmhK6oRgRygE1DamgNUDP q7oVHs0c7g7L+NvT3752tSRSjiFi4J696uo9c= Received: by 10.91.107.14 with SMTP id j14mr471975agm.41.1279752772879; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:52:52 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.150.241.31 with SMTP id o31ls302962ybh.5.p; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.229.11 with SMTP id b11mr1565407ybh.24.1279752771871; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.45.207 with SMTP id g15mr35605bkf.15.1279749644635; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:00:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.45.207 with SMTP id g15mr35604bkf.15.1279749644590; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:00:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f42.google.com (mail-fx0-f42.google.com [209.85.161.42]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id d23si5203694bkd.7.2010.07.21.15.00.43; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:00:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of paskios@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.42; Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so4793382fxm.1 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:00:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.108.137 with SMTP id f9mr1059949fap.3.1279749643225; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:00:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.223.104.132 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:00:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <481DD0B8-A96C-4952-8EF5-7F2E5B2CDF08@cosmicray.co.uk> References: <3c4ace6b-a18e-4306-a2b1-8cef523e20f3@u36g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <10ef5a69-ef57-4fa5-86dc-a61f0b4178f6@q16g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <201007202235.57096.phma@phma.optus.nu> <481DD0B8-A96C-4952-8EF5-7F2E5B2CDF08@cosmicray.co.uk> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:00:43 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Lojban Kids Show - names From: tijlan To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: paskios@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of paskios@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=paskios@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c598aee2c94a048becee5d --001636c598aee2c94a048becee5d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 21 July 2010 20:49, CosmicRay wrote: > While on the subject of sexism, please don't take the temporary naming of > Alpha and Beta as denoting some kind of superior-inferior > quasi-social-position of the characters in relation to each other > That was my initial impression, so I felt tempted to point out some kind of neutral basis on which to decide the main character's gender in case there were no other good reasons to consider. But now I understand the situation. More male Lojbanists. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --001636c598aee2c94a048becee5d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 21 July 2010 20:49, CosmicRay <cr@cosmicray.co.uk> wrote:
While on the subject of sexism, please don&= #39;t take the temporary naming of Alpha and Beta as denoting some kind of = superior-inferior quasi-social-position of the characters in relation to ea= ch other

That was my initial impression, so I felt tempt= ed to point out some kind of neutral basis on which to decide the main char= acter's gender in case there were no other good reasons to consider.
But now I understand the situation. More male Lojbanists.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--001636c598aee2c94a048becee5d--