From lojban+bncCNSZ3eHoCBCi0KfiBBoEmVKlLQ@googlegroups.com Fri Jul 23 12:07:03 2010 Received: from mail-qy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.216.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OcNa1-0006rG-HI; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:07:03 -0700 Received: by qyk27 with SMTP id 27sf123099qyk.16 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:06:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:received:mime-version:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=TvanEUxRYRZdmL3ULS/pzjPTksunMLd0+EqVFGap7vM=; b=1ynAtKPSXjlLwfEJNsBbvbIuJTxa3fgrGJ3YJvvfrY0x11VUJAnwN5pvQrmwwkY7Un EKmtnf7Jfq5wsDRGXFWsnKodTEtoncDdOfBFtKE8vmb6j1sJCWxKKRCAjd0fCYyn52Vs A4WoMZ3gbvGTvCZe/L68VXuxkFRMos/ooFadY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=DcWEaZtwQ29Ayo8gV+IeKRUqgn2s/NuEM82uQp+TfnfbkZ9aO0l6ysqQhiBTCbMJzA +FCpdMizT6v+2h4IKWvtvR0tjuKMYxJOYnINTdwDYiZuNb79WlnQCyxcBBYnNz5FihDi IT2zy+LxQbGd3PZOGRUm8l2H2Ip+ilut2hvRA= Received: by 10.224.69.203 with SMTP id a11mr414589qaj.39.1279911970249; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:06:10 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.224.66.218 with SMTP id o26ls407393qai.3.p; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:06:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.20.77 with SMTP id e13mr405797qab.2.1279911965996; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:06:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.20.77 with SMTP id e13mr405794qab.2.1279911963143; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com (mail-vw0-f46.google.com [209.85.212.46]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id j3si332659qcs.1.2010.07.23.12.06.02; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:06:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of frankdmartinez@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.46 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.46; Received: by mail-vw0-f46.google.com with SMTP id 3so569488vws.19 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:06:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.126.166 with SMTP id c38mr2026526vcs.52.1279911961667; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:06:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.94.78 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:05:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Frank Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:05:41 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Lojban spelling alphabet To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: frankdmartinez@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of frankdmartinez@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.46 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=frankdmartinez@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0050450160f3d1abc3048c12b90a --0050450160f3d1abc3048c12b90a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I think the avoidance of the duplication is very useful, yes. On 23 July 2010 14:17, Daniel Brockman wrote: > > Respectfully, suggest "bebna" for "b" > > I had that first, but changed it in order to avoid using the same vowel > pair in both {denpa} and {bebna}. > > I'm not sure, but to me it seems that having the vowels distinct may > be the most important characteristic. Do you agree? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0050450160f3d1abc3048c12b90a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think the avoidance of the duplication is very useful, yes.

On 23 July 2010 14:17, Daniel Brockman <dbrockman@gmail.com> wrote:
> =A0Respectfully, suggest "bebna" for "b"

I had that first, but changed it in order to avoid using the same vow= el
pair in both {denpa} and {bebna}.

I'm not sure, but to me it seems that having the vowels distinct may be the most important characteristic. =A0Do you agree?

--
You received this message because = you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0050450160f3d1abc3048c12b90a--