From lojban+bncCK30vq5WEK-rvOIEGgQ_5qD7@googlegroups.com Tue Jul 27 10:22:22 2010 Received: from mail-px0-f189.google.com ([209.85.212.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Odnqv-0007Bj-7y; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:22:21 -0700 Received: by pxi13 with SMTP id 13sf333371pxi.16 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:21:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; bh=/8y/3IRDamHGbz5pRWVA9PrWsJZPbPLHOHK7avpU32s=; b=4mbZtWvHbLgTz4KreocQyVb8grI6kWJxSaRl9exy3vAieIF9s4pNHQIqDGAR4AKFm8 +MHpQseXdb8ALUvaQNMNT6c4MuTH0x3PseECgzTASOaENLmgrtviBIITPdZnRMx5YJy1 3nyW8l1++JZzY9UIy4A1n5DQYLMJL+K0TsYQ0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; b=ELrFdRzLXkpyxkoR3R+tCyzLICI2/pUtErpjduRDjdnq7FpvK5zsckcw7t95arLQ7Z R9yfjv6wIQpMy2eEPuqT/3BjseoirR61LKXHpDULFKRnF8l29Q+7IMr0xCj6fMcfvmoC HnmX5XAcm0+75zMV1snmbIFZp47phNvT/t6Lo= Received: by 10.142.3.13 with SMTP id 13mr789643wfc.26.1280251311011; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:21:51 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.142.248.40 with SMTP id v40ls5864438wfh.1.p; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:21:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.233.12 with SMTP id f12mr2174357wfh.44.1280251309756; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:21:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.233.12 with SMTP id f12mr2174356wfh.44.1280251309707; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:21:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org (chain.digitalkingdom.org [64.81.66.169]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id i10si5741107wfa.5.2010.07.27.10.21.49; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:21:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 64.81.66.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=64.81.66.169; Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Odnqe-0007AA-2d for lojban@googlegroups.com; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:21:48 -0700 Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:21:48 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Strange links in jbovlaste Message-ID: <20100727172147.GN4511@digitalkingdom.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 64.81.66.169 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Those all seem like good corrections, but this probably belongs on the jbovlaste mailing list, which is at jbovlaste@lojban.org -Robin On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 06:56:08PM +0930, David Gowers wrote: > coi do'o, > > I found some gismu in jbovlaste had broken references ( for example > xexso, which said 'cf blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah...' > in the notes, but the references weren't properly {bracketed}). I'm > sure there are more, but I've fixed them. > > I've also found there are some valsi referring to {causal} and > {resultative} -- IMO these should not be {references} -- unless we can > link to an article on the wiki describing the difference between them, > or something similar. (an instance of this is the entry for {stika}) > Is it appropriate to remove the {bracketing} from them so they don't > come up as links? > > I found these when making a little script to use makfa to build a > graph of the relations between lojban valsi. It's not quite ready yet, > but I plan to post the results somewhere soon. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.