From lojban+bncCNf8pM-bDBC9uNPhBBoErU5hZQ@googlegroups.com Wed Jul 07 12:58:06 2010 Received: from mail-gy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OWaks-0005E3-DK; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:58:06 -0700 Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4sf33540gyg.16 for ; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:57:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received :sender:received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=+rlL48b6FpUowlQqkhBwLkbpfy86Lf7IMulPjY0YN40=; b=J4j4z83LdL5raRmboNEIRHSlKEPU62AYOGHBX/jtllSM8oQTnxVroiVgYM7eIrC3Ot 7kBDSOAy2xygY4rABwO7UK50ldA4JCxk7sk42tfbTBPd1UJjpeFw9PMMdk0XDVx/iWBG tMC+KfQB0ut5vqlOGFpHxGfGz3bca0nbGc+vo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=05RwFQ6/U8u6a+wT3p0ueg2pUnXInI+suRe+2jlf9VvCzG6ke73irpxp6D/j0iPEDz AID1KyGBMokyDGWOyjVePrkDGGL8vPIK4i6e5JGh+0tvr7t48VEt+O7MfNY8VcBZpmHs awT88PljSdgEAmz5eYhFVG6TW7fm2KP/hClsk= Received: by 10.100.153.14 with SMTP id a14mr708170ane.21.1278532669735; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:57:49 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.160.35 with SMTP id m35ls8322518ano.2.p; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:57:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.124.18 with SMTP id w18mr4999318anc.5.1278532668282; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:57:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.147.204 with SMTP id m12mr448458wbv.28.1278531417777; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:36:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.147.204 with SMTP id m12mr448457wbv.28.1278531417751; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:36:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f180.google.com (mail-wy0-f180.google.com [74.125.82.180]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id x33si5611014wbs.1.2010.07.07.12.36.56; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of paskios@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.180; Received: by wya21 with SMTP id 21so5857wya.25 for ; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:36:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.131.161 with SMTP id m33mr1454363wei.13.1278531416534; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.86.211 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 12:36:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201007071157.10932.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <201006271620.06248.phma@phma.optus.nu> <201007062254.33578.phma@phma.optus.nu> <201007071157.10932.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 20:36:56 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] relative clause in a name From: tijlan To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: paskios@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of paskios@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.180 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=paskios@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d64717eaad86048ad14abb --0016e6d64717eaad86048ad14abb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 7 July 2010 16:57, Pierre Abbat wrote: > And there is no such thing as > an adjective in Lojban. > But what does an adjective do to a noun? It modifies as a dependent. And that's quite analogous with how a seltau relates to a tertau in a sumti-fied tanru in Lojban. A tanru is closer than a NOI clause to the natlang "adjective + noun", in my opinion. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0016e6d64717eaad86048ad14abb Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 7 July 2010 16:57, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
And there is no such thing as
an adjective in Lojban.

But what does an adjective= do to a noun? It modifies as a dependent. And that's quite analogous w= ith how a seltau relates to a tertau in a sumti-fied tanru in Lojban. A tan= ru is closer than a NOI clause to the natlang "adjective + noun",= in my opinion.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0016e6d64717eaad86048ad14abb--