From lojban+bncCIycn8S8DhCl3NzhBBoE2tJSrg@googlegroups.com Fri Jul 09 07:12:10 2010 Received: from mail-qy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.216.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OXEJ6-0001NH-Ba; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 07:12:10 -0700 Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30sf6959214qyk.16 for ; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 07:11:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kEvri0kuP97KmPfzR3wGEJKAlD+nGkPjPcfh7oYB5z8=; b=4WTiKmbfYx1jUdFhzVFTz67VxTJpAGW0RDd/XCNAwac+kK6b07MM6jYiTfbX1tJyaV kM24NtCHaP6aqN6b1/a4L4bQxvSlmWQZxcMXqv0QLH0TM2Ex11pnGhxpsab+TPH2xZ3v sHQayL0yD2RhucOovyZiUfFXCsXEsOMPVW4Pc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=57cvd+Juer6K8UlPFqkhOsLI13FKq33gPbXGMwLv/2nFXE06Zl7UtIxEQlojIq9Cd8 Tb1ayFMWLysPojvNX4hq/fOihNYvJARhlCf+vYELRho36VsZRNvRygewY/aNBvNwbVp4 Nsohv6SzTX8RpayLTtpDl9nWx/6TwJPf11gxQ= Received: by 10.224.69.203 with SMTP id a11mr74157qaj.39.1278684709641; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 07:11:49 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.224.100.139 with SMTP id y11ls64983qan.4.p; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 07:11:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.11.2 with SMTP id r2mr382810qar.19.1278684708078; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 07:11:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.11.2 with SMTP id r2mr382809qar.19.1278684708052; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 07:11:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vw0-f41.google.com (mail-vw0-f41.google.com [209.85.212.41]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id h19si543396qcp.11.2010.07.09.07.11.46; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 07:11:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.41; Received: by vws1 with SMTP id 1so612924vws.0 for ; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 07:11:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.52.85 with SMTP id h21mr5632041qag.240.1278684706510; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 07:11:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.214.20 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:11:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201007081024.14998.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <201007080419.45295.phma@phma.optus.nu> <201007081024.14998.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:11:44 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] zo pu'o sumtcita From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Of course, Xorxes and I have never seen eye to eye on the ZAho sumtcita. I think your first construction was fine (but yes, substituting jutmrobi'o or co'i jutmro for jutmro. --gejyspa On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Thursday 08 July 2010 09:05:45 Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: >> =A0lo dinsauro jenai cipni cu jutmro ca lo tersei be lo bakrycedra bei >> lo cibmoicedra > On Thursday 08 July 2010 09:21:30 tijlan wrote: >> This appears to say that all dinosaurs *were* extinct between "lo >> bakrycedra" and "lo cibmoicedra" rather than that they *went* extinct >> during that span. I suggest: >> >> =A0ro dinsauro jenai cipni cu jutmro co'a lo bakrycedra bi'o cibmoicedra > > "lo bakrycedra bi'o cibmoicedra" doesn't sound sensible, as each is a spa= n of > time, and the first ends when the second starts (many paleontologists bel= ieve > that the boundary was an asteroid impact). How about Jorge's version > with "jutmrobi'o"?: > > lo dinsauro jenai cipni cu jutmrobi'o ca lo tersei be lo bakrycedra bei l= o > cibmoicedra > > Pierre > -- --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.