From lojban+bncCICntNPQBRCS-_jiBBoE-8U0qg@googlegroups.com Sat Aug 07 22:16:27 2010 Received: from mail-yx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.213.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OhyFB-0005br-1A; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 22:16:26 -0700 Received: by yxj4 with SMTP id 4sf19930106yxj.16 for ; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 22:16:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:mime-version :received:received:date:in-reply-to:x-ip:references:user-agent :x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=csex7oubLuNveAgFUvW/RnDHNRtJi9gBpsOexubTAqY=; b=FB+Ih83sSV2C1MgyKfnoilzL2IT8x+CwAOEnUblqw3Zw2RUUUIkbgSOiicCGxRtpkd S2J6Uxw7GnmQ1EZZ8buwRVfRm+lG3EPVVvoeNyIoP15FMvS2kPuASzm/abRbAoVcAI4p 1kh7RgKyL1m9x8Mbzh0NFwiaHJnj5s0exQ8BU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:x-ip:references :user-agent:x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=VecWoKWcwGQC1UbxBn+6Oy9DBuXWrFfKMwzWN0vUAF/RsQgEEDsOEUjvvfvds5n+RS 6I87oCSI7TZjrWqu+V81iRPW+5p1OqC34tkgt8bJPZM4uWK3gfFjKUdZ8d8u4zS5ZnF6 5x9OK/pCSt5CQHzMTOAXOPt4pM6sSsKVsoYfs= Received: by 10.90.114.12 with SMTP id m12mr2651780agc.32.1281244562756; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 22:16:02 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.91.157.16 with SMTP id j16ls272236ago.7.p; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 22:16:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.67.7 with SMTP id p7mr2641414aga.0.1281244562150; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 22:16:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by v6g2000prd.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 22:16:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 22:16:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-IP: 32.173.64.151 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100722 Firefox/3.6.8 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe) Message-ID: <58ee2fb8-60fe-45d8-a060-991978e4b673@v6g2000prd.googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: Cool From: Lindar To: lojban X-Original-Sender: lindarthebard@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Shouldn't there be an exclamation indicator? even at the > observational? Just to be a little less unambiguous? > Just asking. You mean more unambiguous? Either way, we have {ba'e} and {sai} and a bunch of other things. I'm sure you could use those if you wanted. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.