From lojban+bncCMHEmaCOBhCL2YfjBBoEa9NxEA@googlegroups.com Tue Aug 10 17:20:04 2010 Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Oiz2n-00089P-FU; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:20:04 -0700 Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15sf1322599wwe.16 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:19:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=RAYrgsJD3nG3qFd1qlIuvf0jmrXBILKAtPfaUbaC1Hc=; b=EBrJ79kxxQutx/QhS67lPAWxdw0UESbCfq9xVKPJXbz1V+8AjBPTaAqneBZ80yPSQ7 WY8vL+9yJCOzSIniYnqNjTxZnRvn4U7LONOExruZL1Kec3EPr9uZjb+8pJT3Gzsh9wnK Z/Ak3gauDAURXVJrIT+hob55NrjpfMfQBAhCs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=rgO0vk2tzdadbiNhD+1mMmFM2eXr1N4ZGVP5cXm+WqXZRZE6Rjrbfsw0CPERLCZSLC JKEw34RbiO9EXcw47HQtCbDiE0KBKDzypqZYyFb7AWb7gdmAboXlhjpqXGORLVgUkgkY GlpSqmPDOt9hs6jIE1/LLc+F0qosYhUXhT+14= Received: by 10.216.144.194 with SMTP id n44mr3983823wej.19.1281485963603; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:19:23 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.227.139.159 with SMTP id e31ls2396974wbu.0.p; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:19:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.128.145 with SMTP id k17mr795326wbs.23.1281485962188; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:19:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.128.145 with SMTP id k17mr795324wbs.23.1281485961769; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ww0-f52.google.com (mail-ww0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id q13si2472241wbs.0.2010.08.10.17.19.20; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:19:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.52; Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15so6183067wwe.21 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:19:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.22.74 with SMTP id s52mr4550758wes.11.1281485960553; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:19:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.24.209 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:19:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1281378142.4450.7.camel@cmalu.WAG54GS> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:19:20 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: jbominji From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364d1b8d76a842048d81335e --0016364d1b8d76a842048d81335e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I would assume your best bet to get it running would be to compile it from source code. At the very least you'll be told what doesn't work, and if you're lucky, you'll get told why. On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:23 PM, purpleposeidon wrote: > > What would the most convenient format be for deploying them on another > > server? I can try to build a binary SBCL image, this would be limited to > > 64-bit linux and will not be portable across different versions of SBCL. > > Instructions on how to get it running would be the most useful, > Lojban.org runs an old debian, with an older version of SBCL > (1:1.0.18.0-2) than mine. (1:1.0.29.11-1ubuntu1). (I've tried to get > it running, but have no idea what I'm doing.) Can the binary images > run faster? Otherwise, I don't think there's any reason to use them. > But if they do, a list of needed packages and commands to run would be > better. (Fish, fisherman, length of time fed for, etc.) > > Thank you for helping with this. > > mu'omi'e.djeims. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0016364d1b8d76a842048d81335e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I would assume your best bet to get it running would be to compile it from = source code. At the very least you'll be told what doesn't work, an= d if you're lucky, you'll get told why.

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:23 PM, purpleposeidon <purpleposeidon@gmail.com> wrote:
> What would the most convenient format be for deployi= ng them on another
> server? I can try to build a binary SBCL image, this would be limited = to
> 64-bit linux and will not be portable across different versions of SBC= L.

Instructions on how to get it running would be the most useful,
Lojban.org runs an old debian, with an older version of SBCL
(1:1.0.18.0-2) than mine. (1:1.0.29.11-1ubuntu1). (I've tried to get it running, but have no idea what I'm doing.) Can the binary images
run faster? Otherwise, I don't think there's any reason to use them= .
But if they do, a list of needed packages and commands to run would be
better. (Fish, fisherman, length of time fed for, etc.)

Thank you for helping with this.

mu'omi'e.djeims.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.




--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu
=

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0016364d1b8d76a842048d81335e--