From lojban+bncCIycn8S8DhC_mPHiBBoEyRs_Ag@googlegroups.com Fri Aug 06 10:54:29 2010 Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OhR7e-0000JT-1s; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:54:28 -0700 Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11sf4259246vws.16 for ; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:54:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4FpQHe4vVUMHvWAtUy1aLq45bNWbJRGFjgmQ0DNEVOA=; b=LeVX56jyOtmSBQvEF9Xc1RulevbsilENQ8/NYjaqxNi7heF3gnl3AQUDkmV90603Ar Ucb3Sl4AIGlmtsttudHuEcRFTCntEiee7UGo29MtGg3MJJMRLTk0l4TPnwnqrgL3+NY6 XKYMMjxBNt6RsPX2dj2ljgnTs/28B7Ow3MY1I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HAzQaqfp3mSHPomvSs40W8OS9U6FW7yuSByedgO4ZTxQvRrCtHDnnkoJinj93Kfudl VT2BQLFx11mej3NhGd3+1hsK8aUIg7fWOpT2Cm2Tas4kBCRl+9gsaLqduujlsu66dwsx SHvDjtJtOiy7XG4L9ttiOWYxb4XmNcOmBOhrk= Received: by 10.220.168.207 with SMTP id v15mr2052087vcy.31.1281117247011; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:54:07 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.101.101 with SMTP id b37ls835295vco.5.p; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.188.4 with SMTP id cy4mr4049129vcb.13.1281117245674; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.188.4 with SMTP id cy4mr4049105vcb.13.1281117244346; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:54:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id e23si194733vcs.2.2010.08.06.10.54.03; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:54:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.175; Received: by qyk11 with SMTP id 11so4763631qyk.20 for ; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:54:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.181.198 with SMTP id bz6mr4989983qcb.114.1281117242958; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:54:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.251.143 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:54:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 13:54:02 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Illogical English Sign From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010/8/6 Jorge Llamb=EDas : > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Michael Turniansky > wrote: >>=A0Social >> ostracism is an important mechanism of compliance. > > Here's another cultural tidbit for Lindar. I suspect in my culture > being the coworker doing the approaching in this case would be more > embarrasing than being the one approached. But I don't have any > experience with work in a hospital. Do coworkers actually approach one > other with this stuff? And relying too much on this for compliance may > encourage the attitude of "if I'm alone in the bathroom I don't really > need to wash". > I've never seen anyone approached. And I *have* seen coworkers who have not washed.. and not just anyone.. but a renowned pathologist who has been in the specialty for 30+ years. You would think he would know better. Yet, did I approach him? No... Coward! --gejyspa --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.