From lojban+bncCIywt_XDCRDStKnkBBoEpFMM2g@googlegroups.com Fri Sep 10 09:18:43 2010 Received: from mail-yx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.213.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ou6JD-0007DI-4o; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:18:43 -0700 Received: by yxs7 with SMTP id 7sf2144361yxs.16 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:18:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:message-id:x-ymail-osg:received :x-mailer:references:date:from:subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=xX4TMvnef5uVnv5wL22CLPAeU7QGXD2VG/iKk0GfbUw=; b=CwynHxJWsZae3HGQegtya248A+nDDeeIGWL6DG5Y8zClvAMcTADSqGQftirFMcHuJK FUrxMU4twBRjHIYmMV9mgyDeUTuIxuDTxqKNsToI2oLJpysDVF96jweilYx+tOUhM5jF KAUvlmTM4c4X+gxMT7OeiJblVW2hy2nH/Lx/M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:x-ymail-osg:x-mailer:references :date:from:subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=uVYLhFzcq6bq6c26TX1n86s8ckNuIbQJbHctR+esuEIbVG3xeMMoQBiPHxY09yfv6g gDRbaAZPUX9YUb2SWp2fKsVCt6ct6KqfgnhabnDTVS7mLKyUAN0vgW2vWnX8ob37ZYZ7 JfTE6bHBVw/GlMAamQkDkqoUIMuixgw+/6UXk= Received: by 10.101.179.34 with SMTP id g34mr34882anp.15.1284135506712; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:18:26 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.185.34 with SMTP id m34ls3225949anp.7.p; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:18:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.154.9 with SMTP id b9mr579395ane.17.1284135505779; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:18:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.154.9 with SMTP id b9mr579392ane.17.1284135505734; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:18:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.199.123]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id j8si2296384ana.5.2010.09.10.09.18.24; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:18:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 68.142.199.123 as permitted sender) client-ip=68.142.199.123; Received: (qmail 63815 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Sep 2010 16:18:24 -0000 Message-ID: <214923.60428.qm@web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: wV5GAY8VM1nxYfNG9DO2w0_zVpkaz6k12QgGACII.JQnla_ mQY02oESnEF02T8UNsBD3La7FTD6wDyVp7Al17YeoHuVNlp4TgwnrD.gmBLD F6Zof5aVKWU7nxZYvXT4CnvdLGGDBozq5TEaEHGrxDtieaXhjDBAbl0cVQl6 fhiWKPxpPSlr.hCAVwSfALGojmcpvIrkgQgTFVYBQK56AiZmXi.4zzvPZoVX XprGs3HB2XdpBdDCH9.9JznyMoJZ71boZtGKmpVxk8ult28PP_YTGFZelYhp YjglWMjmfYZy0NmXbgVWPiZN2jq0L29wLSoqixXhSbVdVRvJzytHVwow- Received: from [99.92.110.13] by web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:18:24 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/470 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 References: <20100910011141.GS20652@digitalkingdom.org> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:18:24 -0700 (PDT) From: John E Clifford Subject: Re: [lojban] Teaching methods, especially WRT terminators, and validation thereof To: lojban@googlegroups.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 68.142.199.123 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1253231403-1284135504=:60428" --0-1253231403-1284135504=:60428 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 To sum up. 1) 'cu' is a part of Lojban that is not going away and that needs to be learned even if only for reading things from yore. 2) 'cu' is more efficient and more informative than mere terminators in the place where it occurs 3) It is arguable that learning 'cu' before the terminators decreases the students' understanding of terminators, or, at least makes them harder to learn. 4) It is arguable that learning 'cu' first has no significant effect on student competence with terminators nor in their ease of learning.. (the null) 5) There is presently no way to test 3 (and 4) 6) Until there is (and maybe even after), people will use whatever method they are comfortable with and have found successful. BTW xorlo is not the worst thing to happen to Lojban (it is, after all 90% right, or better). The worst thing to happen to Lojban is the mass of RHE, elidable until you need them but disastrous if you don't see you need them or make a mistake in using them. I really do wish Lojban were really based on Symbolic Logic -- sometimes. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0-1253231403-1284135504=:60428 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To sum up.
1) 'cu' is a part of Lojban t= hat is not going away and that needs to be learned even if only for reading= things from yore.
2) 'cu' is more efficient and more informative= than mere terminators in the place where it occurs
3) It is argu= able that learning 'cu' before the terminators decreases the students' unde= rstanding of terminators, or, at least makes them harder to learn.
4) It is arguable that learning 'cu' first has no significant effect on s= tudent competence with terminators nor in their ease of learning.. (the nul= l)
5) There is presently no way to test 3 (and 4)
6) Un= til there is (and maybe even after), people will use whatever method they a= re comfortable with and have found successful.

BTW xorlo is not the worst thing to h= appen to Lojban (it is, after all 90% right, or better).  The worst th= ing to happen to Lojban is the mass of RHE, elidable until you need them bu= t disastrous if you don't see you need them or make a mistake in using them= .  I really do wish Lojban were really based on Symbolic Logic -- some= times.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0-1253231403-1284135504=:60428--