From lojban+bncCJ2UzZHuDRDTmqrkBBoEUC4psQ@googlegroups.com Fri Sep 10 12:56:20 2010 Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ou9ho-0003wD-G4; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:56:20 -0700 Received: by wyb35 with SMTP id 35sf636634wyb.16 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:56:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7d3tju8JDy8U3W4uem57uxncBirpuOwN0rioqzYffzw=; b=4OehHrN+kXVDm+yiafCuTP4mWjL6uMFDz+EiebfRitavLH6TjYrdbUQvMTIKUVjDcO HCZMwTHZcFrRddQ0cRuojrTDJsM6OILiIvffq8Fh4A/LyE0cuhz92BHZ2WQj/t5YU3ZN PIdewAinMayTJZylNYYMdkf+/1G7gj4HYkVCY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=szZc3TmTECfMEb/cMSE0LDSDCfKliOdLy65Sbex2c1CjPMuvgGo7Bkfg6kG9Rw1jqy sz+njzTreRvD/Tszqh5hC6lYAan38WhLXudv2nDR6UvQgejJoJCSqfKVcx7v3lp/PrVa mrPsIophnQ3A5tJv0zCnrIKUqbJf2ukVdklEI= Received: by 10.216.145.214 with SMTP id p64mr214884wej.12.1284148563641; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:56:03 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.198.162 with SMTP id v34ls3477039wen.3.p; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:56:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.236.156 with SMTP id w28mr10832weq.0.1284148562572; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:56:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.236.156 with SMTP id w28mr10831weq.0.1284148562557; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:56:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ww0-f43.google.com (mail-ww0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id r4si992228wec.6.2010.09.10.12.56.01; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:56:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.43; Received: by wwi14 with SMTP id 14so3613076wwi.24 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:56:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.135.211 with SMTP id o19mr357994wbt.73.1284148561020; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:56:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.151.203 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:56:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100910193708.GH20652@digitalkingdom.org> References: <20100910011141.GS20652@digitalkingdom.org> <20100910193708.GH20652@digitalkingdom.org> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:56:00 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Teaching methods, especially WRT terminators, and validation thereof From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:23:23AM -0300, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: >> >> I'm not completely happy that xorlo is attributed to me so much. I >> think And Rosta had a lot to do with it, > > *BLINK* > > Wasn't And the one who stormed off in a huff because xorlo struck em > as anti-Lojbanic? Oh dear, no, no, no. That would be totally out of character for And. And is the only (or at least the only one I know about) real linguist that was ever involved with Lojban. He hasn't been active lately, but he's still around. He's still an LLG member and present at the meeting, weren't you paying attention during roll-call? :) > If not, who was that? I was going to say maybe you meant pc, althoug "stormed off in a huff" sounded excessive. I think he quit the LLG but that was before xorlo, and I don't recall it being for language-related issues. But if you did not mean him, I have no idea. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.