From lojban+bncCMHEmaCOBhC69bHkBBoEWGHEBw@googlegroups.com Sun Sep 12 00:01:32 2010 Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OugZ4-0006S5-55; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 00:01:31 -0700 Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15sf798574wwe.16 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 00:01:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=CRK3CNJ/p+AdKHI4DGS68tdWbY7vjPaYyaVemOT6tFw=; b=JvWGLM+GiXTC/6eEk/SEGceyG/E9Es3U3Q4xZNtKkD1aumzoD96qD2ElTguji4LT5V igLAEWuEPcciufyWwVD1v4KwFVBMNy/XtxazIXYwPPAwFIEW3dBxS+/hGr7zAKCx96k5 S2yHfoojnoDfXzynUAr+RG2VD2s2jZkPWr6bs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=WNw2lSSXuCcqg/dm5qDQegOj5wPeo57S/nfbi6VYXal23kaYnVUqi/yTY9IA1OApG/ dlVxYoit/uQ6ScJDRfbvOwE48bFpJ5a3Pt6GRBpitq6wrsopb+QyDG5oBeBAG7YzK8Rh lCzdp1pU0pK6DaTh8Y2doPRLFus6Zcfgc4uo8= Received: by 10.216.145.9 with SMTP id o9mr339235wej.15.1284274874733; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 00:01:14 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.227.139.159 with SMTP id e31ls3352904wbu.0.p; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 00:01:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.136.195 with SMTP id s3mr145230wbt.25.1284274872895; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 00:01:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.136.195 with SMTP id s3mr145229wbt.25.1284274872858; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 00:01:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ww0-f47.google.com (mail-ww0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id x33si1747943wbs.5.2010.09.12.00.01.11; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 00:01:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.47; Received: by mail-ww0-f47.google.com with SMTP id 31so4753433wwb.4 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 00:01:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.174.69 with SMTP id w47mr2939277wel.25.1284274871585; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 00:01:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.22.199 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 00:01:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <91b0797f-74e7-43fe-9b83-2053dd48ea03@i4g2000prf.googlegroups.com> References: <20100911215035.GG13937@digitalkingdom.org> <8B06025C-7DF2-4C4D-8336-07AAF1CC5C65@switchb.org> <20100912004044.GK13937@digitalkingdom.org> <640A6FE3-8AD3-44E9-B41E-779C7E03989D@switchb.org> <20100912010225.GM13937@digitalkingdom.org> <20100912012219.GA91157@alice.local> <91b0797f-74e7-43fe-9b83-2053dd48ea03@i4g2000prf.googlegroups.com> Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 01:01:11 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Technical, Help Request: What information *should* a Lojban dictionary system have? From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.47 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f1e28a83ccac04900a8bf1 --001485f1e28a83ccac04900a8bf1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Lindar wrote: > My one and only major must have request at this time is this: > > Please make djisku, djicusku, djicysku, and djicycusku all link to the > exact same page/definition. They are all the same word/defined things, > so shouldn't each one be added? When adding new lujvo to the list, it > should add them by component rafsi and generate a score list. > So, exactly what jvozbadoes with tanru, but also with a definition of the lujvo? -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --001485f1e28a83ccac04900a8bf1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Lindar <lindarthebard@yah= oo.com> wrote:
My one and only major must have request at this time is this:

Please make djisku, djicusku, djicysku, and djicycusku all link to the
exact same page/definition. They are all the same word/defined things,
so shouldn't each one be added? When adding new lujvo to the list, it should add them by component rafsi and generate a score list.

So, exactly what jvozba does with t= anru, but also with a definition of the lujvo?

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e= ko klama le bende pe denpa bu

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--001485f1e28a83ccac04900a8bf1--