From lojban+bncCMHEmaCOBhDM2LrkBBoEU3lk2g@googlegroups.com Mon Sep 13 15:57:45 2010 Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OvHxo-0002dC-KC; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:57:45 -0700 Received: by wyb35 with SMTP id 35sf1208927wyb.16 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:57:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=d0W4UfiZy5cWHQGdkAJy//XBAt8avbq2YnFigGsSRKQ=; b=EkejwQyHVMNVMaxRDCvY5ZQNTXR4ZMoBmTmCekMx+/eBDtSRZxWbO+mfnCOUJFPni7 +rVCJpnAmXq9gYqWZdMZOH5ThOFHQKOJizUyN2df+W+HInKrJjOXiR05ZixYAvCF/+Xz bnZbztP3SzT2BQV2K5ZwVnk+KixqI5eGjb7Eg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=u1Ikt3aDqzN8WW5DtcRHTk5FfbyaZYXFNwU15QM3QpWV08p3FD4VrDiTO19EodUWJk J4R+zXKM5uHP5vh6Y1poR6gAb5oMEpWPo6dvn54OExzY86ZbvyUaQOIfVK2MIy4g4V9w ZEyg2+y4edHZedrqUq+ajwv9dOsZcFQSIqjSI= Received: by 10.216.144.194 with SMTP id n44mr709357wej.19.1284418636028; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:57:16 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.198.162 with SMTP id v34ls4608593wen.3.p; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.236.156 with SMTP id w28mr166499weq.0.1284418634921; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.236.156 with SMTP id w28mr166498weq.0.1284418634895; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id s70si2275440weq.13.2010.09.13.15.57.13; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:57:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.50; Received: by mail-ww0-f50.google.com with SMTP id 18so7600855wwb.19 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:57:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.27.193 with SMTP id j1mr874826wbc.137.1284418633742; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:57:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.22.199 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:57:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5f86644c-3420-42ad-81c8-fb0b6ad079b3@s24g2000pri.googlegroups.com> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:57:13 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: le virnu smani blozeile'a From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.50 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0022159748fe683a4504902c046c --0022159748fe683a4504902c046c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Remo Dentato wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Lindar wrote:> > > 7. darxi le my. cidni should be darxi le be my. cidni or darxi le > > cidni be my. cos it's actually his knee. > I'm not sure why be is needed here. Wouldn't be ok to say "darxi le > my. tupcidni" (to indicate the knee, not just an articulation) ? He's suggesting that you specify that the joint being checked belongs to Modi. Specifying that the joint being checked is a knee is different. I say that context is enough in this case, as to me it should be obvious that the joint being checked is Modi's, but his point is valid. -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0022159748fe683a4504902c046c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Remo De= ntato <rdentato@= gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Lindar <lindarthebard@yahoo.com> wrote:>
<snip>
7. darxi le my= . cidni should be darxi le be my. cidni or darxi le
> cidni be my. cos it's actually his knee.
I'm not sure why be is needed here. Wouldn't be ok to say &qu= ot;darxi le
my. tupcidni" (to indicate the knee, not just an articulation) ?

He's suggesting that you specify that the joint being c= hecked belongs to Modi. Specifying that the joint being checked is a knee i= s different.

I say that context is enough in this case, as to me it should be obviou= s that the joint being checked is Modi's, but his point is valid.
--=A0
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko = klama le bende pe denpa bu

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0022159748fe683a4504902c046c--