From lojban+bncCOjSjrXVGBDsn7_kBBoEliHNvQ@googlegroups.com Tue Sep 14 12:41:45 2010 Received: from mail-bw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OvbNs-0003Ea-JP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:41:45 -0700 Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4sf121044bwz.16 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:41:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=1hffgsPBcJByap47V/scI1Aix78Gm+l6AcTR9RWHIKE=; b=hrsnHY7hrY2dPfsEZ3YRI40FUvXBV799eiBTPUjUt71e7NMFwe1qiG+KIvnPlpOuVN 5ommBxzE43NsPJcxCaFb2xsdEk2syzqzhU+ZSv98kGx3kqUVMP9JxratWuACe3jgxgB7 Am+TZTwfu0yJO5PNEt46BP3eaJhu6VLTc3bSo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from :to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=eS8T1a3rh5AqtP3bYQKoNqH/6XN59lzKWwTHa+Nb35fYsF1Vc2A0RlHRz+3x9sc0ZQ KKH/7Bj21ok9QlIBy9SYvEyQs78hqqE7tCkuz2SaaE6C0kzMojumPErRCBeQnnXCxeRc +vYxjyQPYBvOQdxaOMlMWjUB9h0iLWXgKMUGQ= Received: by 10.223.75.25 with SMTP id w25mr10972faj.35.1284493292730; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:41:32 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.36.74 with SMTP id s10ls134296bkd.1.p; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:41:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.85.89 with SMTP id n25mr25749bkl.8.1284493291620; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:41:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.85.89 with SMTP id n25mr25748bkl.8.1284493291584; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:41:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bw0-f47.google.com (mail-bw0-f47.google.com [209.85.214.47]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id n18si299901bkw.6.2010.09.14.12.41.30; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:41:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.47; Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so1185182bwz.6 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:41:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.133.146 with SMTP id f18mr319038bkt.97.1284493290369; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:41:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.98.71 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:41:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:41:30 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: [lojban] "ge ... gi ..." question From: Luke Bergen To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517477fb049f2ee04903d6689 --001517477fb049f2ee04903d6689 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 A little while back I saw xorxes say: {lo prije lo bebna cu simsa lo ka ro roi tolcri ge lo se junri lo se xalbo gi lo se xalbo lo se junri}. I thought this usage of ge gi to get reciprocity was really cool but for some reason it seems like jboski doesn't like it. xorxes, is this a bug in your (beautiful) bridi or in jboski? Followup question which assumes that this is fine and jboski is confused. How would I express the next sumti after the ge... gi... for example, if I want to say {broda ge lo brode lo brodi gi lo brodi lo brode [fo] brodi} where {brodi} fills the fourth place, how do I stop it from getting sucked up into the {gi}. Also, if I want the reciprocal sumti to be x1 and x2 would I say {broda fa ge lo brode lo brodi gi lo brodi lo brode} or {broda ge fa lo brode lo brodi gi fa lo brodi lo brode}? Or are either acceptable? mi'e cribe -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --001517477fb049f2ee04903d6689 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable A little while back I saw xorxes say:
{lo prije lo bebna cu simsa lo ka= ro roi tolcri ge lo se junri lo se xalbo gi lo se xalbo lo se junri}.

I thought this usage of ge gi to get reciprocity was r= eally cool but for some reason it seems like jboski doesn't like it. = =A0xorxes, is this a bug in your (beautiful) bridi or in jboski?

Followup question which assumes that this is fine and j= boski is confused. =A0How would I express the next sumti after the ge... gi= ... =A0for example, if I want to say {broda ge lo brode lo brodi gi lo brod= i lo brode <what terminator> [fo] brodi} where {brodi} fills the four= th place, how do I stop it from getting sucked up into the {gi}.

Also, if I want the=A0reciprocal=A0sumti to be x1 and x= 2 would I say {broda fa ge lo brode lo brodi gi lo brodi lo brode} or {brod= a ge fa lo brode lo brodi gi fa lo brodi lo brode}? =A0Or are either accept= able?

mi'e cribe

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--001517477fb049f2ee04903d6689--