From lojban+bncCOjSjrXVGBCjxb_kBBoERlSxWQ@googlegroups.com Tue Sep 14 14:01:36 2010 Received: from mail-bw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ovcd9-0000jO-44; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:01:36 -0700 Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4sf129607bwz.16 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:01:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=fbh4EtN9W8c4y04ot0geQaPe04PwRqkBkZqUiH6FZBk=; b=04sEnsCrVV0wEmv9B5xBJMJhI2JkVnB/51+iJ5F201Wr35MkDSthn93vJVDgCSketx 48546lFiaol62kN/g3HsVvuWmAH3sxEP7u/+jJpJjRxWgheMjwfBIb1spr1zvD6QUIjs mwirVJS5RLNQunYKaRDmd6o+aOtPz97N207RM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=tXsOaJyfqcO+9OryqsFLbZylnv9Rk5W4+L2DMhjyIpFu7G0a2jU5UbLzpbdRyiLUEd QAKWsmO/JgNY+Q5dj42BuJGK4Zo3JzxHnN0sfjvKx01ufuJEMDvTztYEUp/Jt8Aom7/K F85vKcowr9Zk5T+sSNmtHOOSQwK41cpPoqFXE= Received: by 10.223.5.194 with SMTP id 2mr14148faw.3.1284498083351; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:01:23 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.152.197 with SMTP id h5ls158276bkw.3.p; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:01:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.85.90 with SMTP id n26mr30992bkl.9.1284498082624; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:01:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.85.90 with SMTP id n26mr30991bkl.9.1284498082585; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:01:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com (mail-bw0-f41.google.com [209.85.214.41]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id z17si342905bkb.3.2010.09.14.14.01.21; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:01:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.41; Received: by mail-bw0-f41.google.com with SMTP id 10so723652bwz.14 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:01:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.98.19 with SMTP id o19mr489829bkn.6.1284498081411; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:01:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.98.71 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:01:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:01:21 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] "ge ... gi ..." question From: Luke Bergen To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485ea400edb72d604903e83eb --001485ea400edb72d604903e83eb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I take it that under xorge'a it is parsable? 2010/9/14 Jorge Llamb=EDas > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Luke Bergen > wrote: > > to be honest, at the time I wasn't sure what you meant by that followin= g > > sentence. (I'm still not sure what you meant). > > That I'm not a fan of "nu'i". > > > Why would this sentence require nu'i? How else could {broda ge lo brod= e > lo > > brodi gi lo brodi lo brode} be parsed? > > With the official grammar it is ungrammatical/unparsable. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. > > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --001485ea400edb72d604903e83eb Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I take it that under xorge'a it is parsable?

2010/9/14 Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
> to be honest, at the time I wasn't sure what you meant by that fol= lowing
> sentence. =A0(I'm still not sure what you meant).

That I'm not a fan of "nu'i".

> Why would this sentence require nu'i? =A0How else could {broda ge = lo brode lo
> brodi gi lo brodi lo brode} be parsed?

With the official grammar it is ungrammatical/unparsable.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--001485ea400edb72d604903e83eb--