From lojban+bncCMHEmaCOBhDyyL_kBBoE-BQvWA@googlegroups.com Tue Sep 14 14:09:25 2010 Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ovcki-0001Vg-0o; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:09:24 -0700 Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15sf1457367wwe.16 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:09:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=ifCT+gpOyzMslQ8Pe6KEoucSqis/45HvSpMKLDrgUrE=; b=DuKGMivK695Gjubc4ufsWafALcmiIYBgdQrpVSxi3Qme0RawjnCM+ZxhaSfdadKGQa tJb5lIrBScI0RV95XjnhPrKDSMTx7Nlc9mk9ZZuEC5RPOBJ0jLPyDEINqBk+kByG7WAI mmDvie1+VMdEjNxwt05acL7z2j+LkdKHPZruI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=2xz11ivu794deKE79gru2JkY30iEedu1wH8Fb4LcgX9saJGpT+74ViLK8n9uPrNHow fK8rxAsjRNf6d2nY9LDRQkiDG16G8hCiz6bJQoGywhkvzuSoR+d9Kt5PKmwWel393LJN NHxL/vmBFV+/PhZo2D2iYzUSePPFSnNBS3m7o= Received: by 10.216.145.165 with SMTP id p37mr201563wej.13.1284498546766; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:09:06 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.242.202 with SMTP id i52ls175827wer.0.p; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:09:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.90.138 with SMTP id e10mr246459wef.4.1284498544792; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:09:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.90.138 with SMTP id e10mr246458wef.4.1284498544765; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:09:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com (mail-wy0-f169.google.com [74.125.82.169]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id s70si211274weq.5.2010.09.14.14.09.03; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:09:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.169; Received: by wyb36 with SMTP id 36so8645598wyb.28 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:09:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.188.132 with SMTP id a4mr423078wen.61.1284498543594; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:09:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.22.199 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:09:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:09:03 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] "ge ... gi ..." question From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364d240567cde004903e9f62 --0016364d240567cde004903e9f62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010/9/14 Jorge Llamb=EDas > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Luke Bergen > wrote: > > I take it that under xorge'a it is parsable? > > It's parsable by camxes. > > Should we make "xor" a rafsi for "xorxes"? It would be the first case > of a cmevla with a rafsi. Or maybe we should promote the cmevla to a > gismu "xorxe". > > mu'o mi'e xorxe > I'm all for {xorxe}, but what would it mean? --=20 mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --0016364d240567cde004903e9f62 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2010/9/14 Jorge Llamb=EDas <= ;jjllambias@gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
> I take it that under xorge'a it is parsable?

It's parsable by camxes.

Should we make "xor" a rafsi for "xorxes"? It would be = the first case
of a cmevla with a rafsi. Or maybe we should promote the cmevla to a
gismu "xorxe".

mu'o mi'e xorxe

I'm all = for {xorxe}, but what would it mean?

--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0016364d240567cde004903e9f62--