From lojban+bncCMHEmaCOBhC9_L_kBBoEV5D5CA@googlegroups.com Tue Sep 14 15:59:38 2010 Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OveTB-0002Cz-ME; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:59:38 -0700 Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15sf1479234wwe.16 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:59:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Bm76bqZxXoHQMW3PgsvCvPRnlQPKgS2Sz8GX1pZdPOI=; b=GtPcBlAsi9a//Ua6lEdBSzo+/gVGcE8hmaQJeZ5rfO9HzGlexsQ1shLHYLEtmaCbb6 ZEp5RzNH9FR9be4aesNRNQcoheykw9WF6tI+cKm6J9TE7wGkwgO3i+JCltTcs5qZf9+X i/qCwyxU9yHY8OtZkzSNxz8yKwgTn6QrVlv/o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=Oi1wVuxZR/OsAf8NTP6jf8xYpNUFTQ2vTD8ZUTSb5zsze3RR9SBYr1cFZigW0VteOJ crk3QDJPVConItDnIh7cFK9+BqEH0726I2AC1rCeFTpVxG4OXEoLI8/ly9a3/9MBhxjn FxVJEreTx7F9oiclQrFXL4dLmKmKKi73zoRGI= Received: by 10.216.144.196 with SMTP id n46mr237898wej.6.1284505149196; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:59:09 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.237.165 with SMTP id y37ls208824weq.1.p; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:59:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.178.201 with SMTP id f51mr39495wem.8.1284505148218; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:59:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.178.201 with SMTP id f51mr39494wem.8.1284505148171; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:59:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com (mail-wy0-f174.google.com [74.125.82.174]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id r4si245972wec.6.2010.09.14.15.59.07; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:59:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.174; Received: by wyf22 with SMTP id 22so8127889wyf.5 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:59:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.71.85 with SMTP id q63mr525370wed.53.1284505147004; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:59:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.22.199 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:59:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:59:06 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] "ge ... gi ..." question From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.174 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502d4b5ffd7e104904028e8 --00504502d4b5ffd7e104904028e8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > Okay, what is the best working parser we have right now? > > I know about jbofi'e, which lojban.org says only works on the jboski page= ; > LogGloss, or something based off {tavla cipni}, which I can't get to work > and for which the most recent build is available I can't connect to; > and .camxes., for which I don't have a clue. {xorge'a} as in {xorxe gerna} should be the name of whatever the official replacement to jboski is. > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote= : > >> .i.ua.ui smuni zo xorge'a >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Luke Bergen wrot= e: >> >>> haha, I like it. xorxe: x1 is of/related to the >>> ideal implementation/use of lojban >>> >>> 2010/9/14 Jorge Llamb=EDas >>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Luke Bergen >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > I take it that under xorge'a it is parsable? >>>> >>>> It's parsable by camxes. >>>> >>>> Should we make "xor" a rafsi for "xorxes"? It would be the first case >>>> of a cmevla with a rafsi. Or maybe we should promote the cmevla to a >>>> gismu "xorxe". >>>> >>>> mu'o mi'e xorxe >>>> >>>> >> -- >> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >> >> .i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu >> >> > > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu > > --=20 mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --00504502d4b5ffd7e104904028e8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Jonatha= n Jones <eyeonus@= gmail.com> wrote:
Okay, what is the best working parser we have right now?

I know abou= t jbofi'e, which lojban= .org says only works on the jboski page;
LogGloss, or something base= d off {tavla cipni}, which I can't get to work and for which the most r= ecent build is available I can't connect to;
and .camxes., for which I don't have a clue.
=A0
{x= orge'a} as in {xorxe gerna} should be the name of whatever the official= replacement to jboski is.
=A0
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3= :18 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
.i.ua.ui smuni zo= xorge'a


On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at= 3:08 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
haha, I like it. =A0xorxe: =A0x1 is of/related to the ideal=A0implementatio= n/use=A0of lojban

2010/9/14 Jorge Ll= amb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com>
On Tue= , Sep 14, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:

> I take it that under xorge'a it is parsable?

It's parsable by camxes.

Should we make "xor" a rafsi for "xorxes"? It would be = the first case
of a cmevla with a rafsi. Or maybe we should promote the cmevla to a
gismu "xorxe".

mu'o mi'e xorxe

<= /div>

--
mu'o mi&#= 39;e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu




--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu
=



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu
=

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--00504502d4b5ffd7e104904028e8--