From lojban+bncCNTPpI2KGxDl4MDkBBoEYbQSkQ@googlegroups.com Tue Sep 14 19:33:24 2010 Received: from mail-pw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OvhoH-0002Q4-7n; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:33:24 -0700 Received: by pwj6 with SMTP id 6sf12269pwj.16 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:33:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:x-authority-analysis:x-cloudmark-score :x-originating-ip:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=+Zl1tNC7EQVkzLXWmOblw3IljmM1p/17NZr/9XR4Gv0=; b=0fbS2GhG2YFfZgayOfOhFrLMV6RzdE880ia9KI+uUURCD+VXiRYh7hX1QEUTZq7gk8 jWCDmH7y32bQSaXv3s119kvq4ajQ1l3aj10MszSGfYyWXs80VXMKOGzikPBQL/1BSpSX kUOK8NYWqFk6lu51CeFCcDOhZ0oLujwXOLi+A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authority-analysis:x-cloudmark-score :x-originating-ip:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; b=WtuJZEQqDycKmt+7siU0J5WU2uvsSaR5XEg2ndXCA+/mxxTHi2cIy6OFHREu1bO6fq dqbX3kPjA2YsXa8wgUeV2KJ/wqLRVTZgYjaHTFrr1oXUhdL4zuw1NQzLIdPKRh6ckVm/ pzC8VA9Q6fQpAesAbjO3jy7jzxQMUt8VR8iFc= Received: by 10.115.99.13 with SMTP id b13mr84958wam.14.1284517989429; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:33:09 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.115.66.21 with SMTP id t21ls560462wak.2.p; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:33:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.109.6 with SMTP id l6mr147929wam.14.1284517988935; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:33:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.109.6 with SMTP id l6mr147928wam.14.1284517988886; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:33:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.123]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id d12si1046192wam.3.2010.09.14.19.33.08; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:33:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.123 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=75.180.132.123; X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=qYL/ltCbfNJUfGmhDGumtphIH30dseuhEnbjja0E7b4= c=1 sm=0 a=gB9aN3vlQRsA:10 a=wPDyFdB5xvgA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:17 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=m9xV1Vos_Hlq4C0RrcYA:9 a=sjZVb1pp2b8xq1Xd948ZDWCJwAkA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 75.176.118.168 Received: from [75.176.118.168] ([75.176.118.168:41167] helo=chausie) by cdptpa-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.39 r()) with ESMTP id 7A/6C-23867-460309C4; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 02:33:08 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D6413208 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 22:33:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] "ge ... gi ..." question Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 22:32:48 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201009142232.51672.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.123 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 14 September 2010 17:05:53 Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Luke Bergen wrot= e: > > I take it that under xorge'a it is parsable? > > It's parsable by camxes. > > Should we make "xor" a rafsi for "xorxes"? It would be the first case > of a cmevla with a rafsi. Or maybe we should promote the cmevla to a > gismu "xorxe". I thought it was the rafsi of "xorlo". Pierre --=20 li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.