From lojban+bncCIycn8S8DhDRkY3lBBoE7kQsOQ@googlegroups.com Wed Sep 29 07:11:40 2010 Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P0xNc-0001pI-2c; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:11:39 -0700 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40sf185021wyb.16 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:11:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=GQDVXCcqy4r/4IEBGKfsVSBF4TDCZLEyRwjeMzzGxFo=; b=zsyDhGvqpJeOZmWwcxS9cNYIZRY/mbw6NrYvSR5M67WC5Z42BV0YcCEklDH9c2Yy/e C+tmDhaNEwNzUCiKl/vRx0K35fjct1Hd54CZBlvfvW0OV3GIROlsEcHRwxETjW/DjtcM X8qSMMIJ26oL0qts0eQrswFBpxGU3cvDOvdq0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=4u/IhDYxb0RURawbusdG/CkkZvoK4CtTYHv43OKCqv8OUGkZwEzkzIKO0o3oOiCU82 LCXq1I9wR0XEDYIvAfVH52aOkesUZ9NtrJlTjiPfeBqAcUDzjzLbgLB8Vgop/6qzika/ yQfYOITinXhiEsXUFIwUs8CRUAnaffssfsywM= Received: by 10.216.144.67 with SMTP id m45mr401415wej.2.1285769425652; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:10:25 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.14.26.159 with SMTP id c31ls50301eea.4.p; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:10:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.48.5 with SMTP id u5mr136128eeb.24.1285769423866; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:10:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.48.5 with SMTP id u5mr136127eeb.24.1285769423846; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:10:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ew0-f42.google.com (mail-ew0-f42.google.com [209.85.215.42]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id b5si8908295eei.4.2010.09.29.07.10.22; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.42; Received: by ewy2 with SMTP id 2so323646ewy.15 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:10:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.6.7 with SMTP id j7mr651840mui.91.1285769421918; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:10:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.184.72 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:10:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:10:21 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: reklesi From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364d1fdba849070491668561 --0016364d1fdba849070491668561 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Remo Dentato wrote: > > > 2) "mi bu'u ma" and "mi me'e ma" > Yes they are not full bridi but I think they are clear enough and > appropriate to convey a confusional state of someone that has to ask > himself where he is and what his name is. I think I'll let them in > for now, unless some major issue is raised. Consider that this is a > dialogue, so it is supposed to be "spoken language" rather than the > literary language in a book. I think that if someone says "mi bu'u ma" > you would understand the question. Am I wrong? Possibly, but I doubt any native lojbanist over the age of two or three would ever say it. It would perhaps be a mistake a foreigner to lojbanistan would make. --gejyspa -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0016364d1fdba849070491668561 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Remo Dentato <rdentato@gmail.co= m> wrote:


2) =A0"mi bu'u = ma" and "mi me'e ma"
=A0 =A0Yes they are not full bri= di but I think they are clear enough and
appropriate to convey a confusional state of someone that has to ask
him= self where he is and what his name is. =A0I think I'll let them in
f= or now, unless some major issue is raised. =A0Consider that this is a
di= alogue, so it is supposed to be "spoken language" rather than the=
literary language in a book. I think that if someone says "mi bu'u= ma"
you would understand the question. Am I wrong?
=A0
=A0 Possibly, but I doubt any native lojbanist over the age of two or = three would=A0ever say=A0it.=A0 It would perhaps be a mistake a foreigner t= o lojbanistan would make.
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 --gejyspa
=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0016364d1fdba849070491668561--