From lojban+bncCNTPpI2KGxDm4Y3lBBoEeCi1ow@googlegroups.com Wed Sep 29 10:01:43 2010 Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P102E-0004kl-Dn; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:01:43 -0700 Received: by pzk7 with SMTP id 7sf447165pzk.16 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:01:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:x-authority-analysis:x-cloudmark-score :x-originating-ip:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; bh=MBlapenVhiHxpj2f5vw/SXhdqiUR1q0f/I0EZV3MNyI=; b=vjbn/kq7Cx5+yip/gNZQ/roO/wDXRIQDuSLpa3xOQJfixKXp2XirXDHaXWo0Z7duns iE0QigHjOOpMAn3Prxsmi427FTE6if0Xb+c5GdH48BZsLUBhJBnNWgzqmlV/wiJ4QRg+ 8EtpM5LUh3UY4CK+hIUwi1EQ2F+foWZechXuo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authority-analysis:x-cloudmark-score :x-originating-ip:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; b=3sLfoPkk0MoWV20pZ8iNdyFdUR4YKrp/FjAch0kNL4PkKUpSq2tsJBdXosnAVN8szD bOj6rERv/5lSv5b6Y3eXKPd15Bm64+rH8/ST29QA8ijNLsKVSjl+ETlvHdHbKldPDFNE UcKgAXO7cgdbJS0tN2DmsWSo/LZf16h3e6EFk= Received: by 10.115.36.14 with SMTP id o14mr202285waj.12.1285779686149; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:01:26 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.115.66.21 with SMTP id t21ls770344wak.2.p; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.127.10 with SMTP id z10mr844024wac.15.1285779685526; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.127.10 with SMTP id z10mr844023wac.15.1285779685483; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.120]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id d12si10612353wam.3.2010.09.29.10.01.25; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.120 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=75.180.132.120; X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=R3xZCyK5Rzzq4RgmEA8QIQ3hFZTdsD3z+kRPUs1QTwQ= c=1 sm=0 a=16vxQhsou_YA:10 a=wPDyFdB5xvgA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:17 a=9CYD9TNFerR-w0jg0GkA:9 a=bTBWhBJxdCb3cxdRrY5moQ9eYnsA:4 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 75.176.118.168 Received: from [75.176.118.168] ([75.176.118.168:58005] helo=chausie) by cdptpa-oedge01.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 37/A0-06710-3E073AC4; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:01:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56486080 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:01:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] To Polish fellow lojbanists Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:01:19 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <201009291837.57382.jezuch@interia.pl> In-Reply-To: <201009291837.57382.jezuch@interia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201009291301.20925.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.120 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 29 September 2010 12:37:56 Krzysztof Sobolewski wrote: > So could some confirm that using the same sound for {x} and {'} does not > introduce ambiguity? :) Counterexample: "trixexo" or "trixexu" (they're variants) means "manatee"; "trixe'o" means something like "attractive and kind" and "trixe'u" means some combination of "attract" and "regret". Another counterexample: "ko'otli" (coyote) breaks up into "ko xotli" (be a hotel) if mispronounced. Pierre -- li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.