From lojban+bncCMHEmaCOBhCz2K7lBBoE42wTsA@googlegroups.com Tue Oct 05 15:52:55 2010 Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P3GNO-0003OF-Vt; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:52:55 -0700 Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9sf5159450gxk.16 for ; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:52:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=v9mYVPGhBIkAwjZJw59+z7b75nOryq2QVB+sRlPoyI8=; b=SkkgM8VM4zDNDbf2Pczl6gs4OWtfkIOy3WWLccyY8Mo7OkMrR1M91J+G+DUDnn2bcU aJ2FQYMd5HKZklX9cvsd2dKnLWww1aIHDmZo3AYLaE5BGmZKTqlzIld2h6e4eUuOkHrY 1nisEI/bD+k5kuKELyiVsGrd5xP62ebktsZo4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=mhQBOBLWYBc/CE6qvtf9IPQo3TxGImMdGEn4sxL4eBTILlmY6EjgwfjL2e97iAqlqU z3OYKpcKqZ7N+Ye3lZ9SKMBovtTZxu10cODZBfpJ/L4X2DZc+OqH2vFVMyUiFoHKM9tZ 9qmt6S8oWbVwr9Nb/ZARC1rCTHVJYzCGAIJ2c= Received: by 10.91.159.11 with SMTP id l11mr127912ago.24.1286319155928; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:52:35 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.196.65 with SMTP id ef1ls399414ibb.0.p; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:52:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.35.77 with SMTP id o13mr2469508ibd.3.1286319155126; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:52:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.35.77 with SMTP id o13mr2469507ibd.3.1286319155065; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:52:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com (mail-iw0-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id cn5si65192ibb.2.2010.10.05.15.52.34; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:52:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.169; Received: by iwn41 with SMTP id 41so1032536iwn.28 for ; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:52:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.35.200 with SMTP id q8mr12869194ibd.191.1286319153918; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:52:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.206.16 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:52:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201010011823.25227.phma@phma.optus.nu> <4CA76670.50601@lojban.org> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:52:33 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] la za'e filjvocedra (The Age of Easy Lujvo) From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=002215048a433cb3860491e68472 --002215048a433cb3860491e68472 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010/10/5 Jorge Llamb=EDas > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > > > In any case, until we decide on a single scheme and use it exclusively, > > which seems much more important to me than exactly what that system is, > I'd > > say any discussion about such confusions is moot. > > I would think the discussion has to come before the decision, not > after. What's the point of discussing it afterwards? > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > Discussion about which system to use, yes. Discussion about confusions arising from some people learning the (decided) system, no. --=20 mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi luk. mi patfu d= o zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --002215048a433cb3860491e68472 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2010/10/5 Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com&g= t;
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In any case, until we decide on a single scheme and use it exclusively= ,
> which seems much more important to me than exactly what that system is= , I'd
> say any discussion about such confusions is moot.

I would think the discussion has to come before the decision, not
after. What's the point of discussing it afterwards?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

Discussion about which= system to use, yes.

Discussion about confusions arising from some p= eople learning the (decided) system, no.

--
mu'= ;o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi luk= . mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D= )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--002215048a433cb3860491e68472--