From lojban+bncCNCCoMTMDhCapbjlBBoE6xDWTA@googlegroups.com Thu Oct 07 11:34:18 2010 Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P3vIF-0000sl-M4; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 11:34:18 -0700 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40sf41421wyb.16 for ; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 11:34:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:received:mime-version:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uRsbAaaQQ3u/2jCItIXsJumpw6kuZuePgEk4Ai7t2lU=; b=cIeff+sDxhHmmnEQj/Gsx8bNo5pYYe0sQjy32finbGIqDx/BXw/jphfirqQp/CrteB yRNaHLEGkCzTNb1WB8fNZoKv5sG9IG0R7Y7QJX5ND/xGFIVHumCrXCnSmD+h1KiKBma+ IKdLdG02iDrgaSYr5wDON/CzbEGcwtUTTn45E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=5CXTLJs72SWq1IC1/IbhCvau0r/2LhjpssZabZ1OxGDKh4ET6mZ3Z2s8K1Ln0+scB2 nyaMOirx+SZSphwEKvHDmSpbio4mtQQC2vCJ5e8lqGf2KFpp6+K2z+T0Itgv6bfN3Eb2 e+WwCeFYYzqXMBFa6VMuG56ThBcz0Lk6MNV2s= Received: by 10.216.145.226 with SMTP id p76mr246438wej.3.1286476442284; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 11:34:02 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.237.134 with SMTP id y6ls186492weq.2.p; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 11:34:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.161.66 with SMTP id v44mr62672wek.7.1286476440692; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 11:34:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.161.66 with SMTP id v44mr62671wek.7.1286476440661; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 11:34:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f170.google.com (mail-wy0-f170.google.com [74.125.82.170]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id v4si839287weq.1.2010.10.07.11.33.59; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 11:33:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of selckiku@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.170; Received: by mail-wy0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 36so675223wyg.1 for ; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 11:33:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.196.1 with SMTP id ee1mr1249230wbb.98.1286476439470; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 11:33:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.139.198 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 11:33:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <0cee366c-9694-4744-b8fe-2d95a393f3a6@y12g2000prb.googlegroups.com> From: Stela Selckiku Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:33:28 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: a different weekday proposal To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: selckiku@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of selckiku@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=selckiku@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Michael Turniansky wrote: > > =A0 Hey, I gave my ideas, which were in line with yours.... There were no > comments *pout* I reiterate: > zarskugejyspadei ( Wednesday) > kirgejyspadei (Thursday) > lejgejyspadei (Friday) > djugejyspadei (Saturday) > cevgaugejyspadei (Sunday) > pukygejyspadei (Monday) > kelkangejyspadei (Tuesday) > > =A0 I think those would be fun things to do... OK yes well I did think those were very entertaining but I didn't think we'd actually get people to use them. In fact if those came to be the actual names of the days of the week I bet you'd end up feeling like it was quite strange! :D Are we supposed to help you on djugejyspadei and play games with you con kelkangejyspadei and so forth? We could name the days of the week after important Lojbanists! Except there's no rafsi for "xorxes", except whatever silly rafsi we invented for him the other week, but well I guess we could say ".xorxes. zei djedi". And then there'd be "camgusmisydei" and "xalbydei"... hmm, xalbydei sounds like a fun day anyway! Are you people not taking my suggestion seriously? I'm quite serious. If y'all won't agree with me I might still just go ahead and declare a day as "badnydei" and start promoting it, and we'll just see if any of your dry systematic ideas can survive the competition! I think they won't! A few years from now it'll be like "what were those old boring names we thought of before for badnydei??" and no one will remember. :P mi'e .telselkik. mu'o --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.