From lojban+bncCK7Yk5CUCxC7tr7lBBoEKYVd8w@googlegroups.com Fri Oct 08 15:29:30 2010 Received: from mail-qy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.216.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P4LRP-0007Kd-Ks; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:29:30 -0700 Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10sf377604qyk.16 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:29:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=SKIoKNEF0gMSH2ABu4Vmw7ad5ryjqUt+0vd44AMUPvU=; b=ltVvfAYEvW3B6yRemM7uM2to0rziqWd08fAtV+1KY3KsfGem8g3WDvsRXbGviFn/ju b1ueyzmjBOoxU1Hf+8vfyNZ2+MqH9e+oo2Qts0Gb1y1aCImlKHBJ5rm3kaUE81ACKAWw I3v8JBcBIPnRvF4mYpnw+hbMQp4V+8LnGc5TM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=29+YAN/Xvnod50cVD4zQn2DIk7KD/u80GS3+5RLKDDbWdoAxFX5Ky3Rqhhps74U67x tdgrvcgm0oBdBJebrrfb2azRbGoPbJP/1EwhgHJSpA46iKktQk1uyuNKzIbWLAD5TLoA qLpLqQiCXq+RcIbtC1TEB1keuq63nxUtisBb8= Received: by 10.229.106.137 with SMTP id x9mr168275qco.18.1286576955164; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:29:15 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.229.177.9 with SMTP id bg9ls163903qcb.1.p; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.211.129 with SMTP id go1mr404022qcb.8.1286576954674; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.211.129 with SMTP id go1mr404020qcb.8.1286576954651; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qy0-f177.google.com (mail-qy0-f177.google.com [209.85.216.177]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id m5si1615990qcu.8.2010.10.08.15.29.13; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:29:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.177 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.177; Received: by qyk32 with SMTP id 32so2048336qyk.15 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:29:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.181.139 with SMTP id by11mr2090901qab.172.1286576952815; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:29:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.101.199 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 15:29:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 00:29:12 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Learning cmavo From: Remo Dentato To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: rdentato@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.177 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rdentato@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > It's interesting. Due to the nature of the presentation, I don't think na > pdf is the right format, unless you are capable of changing the page size. > Even then, I'd opt for a high-res png, or other picture format. You could scale and print that PDF on a A3 sheet or even larger and you should not notice any scaling effect. I can surely produce a png for that but that would be much bigger and not better resolution-wise. > Why do you have {ti ta tu} but not {vi va vu}? My understanding is that {vi} {va} and {vu} are space/time cmavo and are not valid as pro-sumti. When we say {le vi plise}, I'm really saying "the apple that is here close to me" rather than "this apple". Am I wrong? > Why are it-6 to it-10 {fo'a - fo'u} above it-1 to it-5 {ko'a - ko'u}? No specific reason, I can easily swap them. > I thought {du} was a pro-bridi? I'm not sure. I initially hadn't it at all, I probably should understand it better. I know see it as just meaning "is the same of". -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.