From lojban+bncCMHEmaCOBhCY0d7lBBoE9SkhhQ@googlegroups.com Thu Oct 14 18:04:43 2010 Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P6Yir-0004ZQ-RU; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:04:43 -0700 Received: by gxk6 with SMTP id 6sf296420gxk.16 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:04:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=YwwyTID6bsAqA09f7tSy/6MZqTYMvvRSgNez+L0edc8=; b=YWo+AUsu7f0BnjU73wfWk8sbnzQpL1yeYFCEybTK1330QfgQmsj5slquLn4zKQwFBH CNqxn/EXFET6cYAbzCBPxqRBmLFv46SLRPsIn/fRmHpDX6DrW5llXre3Lulp2YNOfK1w HzBMSo5eRTSPisy7RZaaNb3BZCo8zJk9lgRcc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=0Eh23DJzHdoN1Ty/yCj+g6qt9xwdFc7cfHVjYlrhI2V7nXkHVrnY8vpoafr5gBIaDP unKNIPF8jgoDPef2m8iNvsKmMgKFu8clgy6Q2PgsJcvqouT158Ybcezv1h0047cF0ebQ dp4merlXNZAcczaMAHNyuLv3tm/CUZ6d51niQ= Received: by 10.150.72.9 with SMTP id u9mr1033859yba.39.1287104664030; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:04:24 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.55.74 with SMTP id t10ls1981847ibg.3.p; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:04:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.170.213 with SMTP id e21mr12030ibz.9.1287104663434; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:04:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.170.213 with SMTP id e21mr12029ibz.9.1287104663393; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:04:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id cm31si7292616ibb.7.2010.10.14.18.04.22; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:04:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.172 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.172; Received: by mail-iw0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 10so304495iwn.31 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:04:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.80.213 with SMTP id u21mr8353103ibk.173.1287104660065; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:04:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.206.68 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:04:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:04:19 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Question regarding {cu'e} From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.172 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015176f0f340d4e9004929d68e8 --0015176f0f340d4e9004929d68e8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010/10/14 Jorge Llamb=EDas > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Stela Selckiku > wrote: > > 2010/10/14 Jorge Llamb=EDas : > >> > >> ("cu'e" is a pointless word with no use whatsoever, BTW, just in case > >> you wanted my opinion on that.) > > > > The only use that occurs to me is if the person you're talking to just > > used "do'e", and you don't understand what they meant by it. > > I think I would go with "do'e ki'a" for that. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > I know I would - and have. --=20 mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu d= o zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --0015176f0f340d4e9004929d68e8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2010/10/14 Jorge Llamb=EDas &l= t;jjllambias@gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Stela Selckiku <selckiku@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/10/14 Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com>:
>>
>> ("cu'e" is a pointless word with no use whatsoever, = BTW, just in case
>> you wanted my opinion on that.)
>
> The only use that occurs to me is if the person you're talking to = just
> used "do'e", and you don't understand what they mean= t by it.

I think I would go with "do'e ki'a" for that.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

I kn= ow I would - and have.

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a= 'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi pat= fu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0015176f0f340d4e9004929d68e8--