From lojban+bncCLr6ktCfBBCLuqPmBBoEZKeaiw@googlegroups.com Wed Oct 27 19:17:04 2010 Received: from mail-gy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PBI2x-0000NK-AK; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:17:04 -0700 Received: by gyd5 with SMTP id 5sf2160309gyd.16 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:16:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:received:received:date:from:to :subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version :in-reply-to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7ORQkce6Fo5hICm5ifRwF6U5jOo3d9ORmBebZUky8yk=; b=mOMNHEJQTg3lErqzALxsGfXi32wy8WpScF1KRuuRzkf+MtpRUiG07Z82wygc84UOis 57hF6Cvprv7Riy4qFhA272rUMllwAmTHV4j9zGhbgIuS53NvTaPNbBLa0O/0BpfLtv1O D7P7JhAo/At5BfoVdAHhKN8lnWR421KiUFbis= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding; b=cZXgCq80Lysm3E2fEe8SebSrQNtwd7Y+WDMEeb4ukC3PZDsKNHSSErNivklqm/hdDZ ylytB9prhArkaZwLZKws5R0xp4L2UCrLYVhRRaQQ3kON17uIGNvEbzYJABXxyq0Dy+LW uZegOFQNAk4XULxT96Ictyfj4rZhNuVVyDghg= Received: by 10.101.93.9 with SMTP id v9mr468063anl.72.1288232203060; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:16:43 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.100.102.9 with SMTP id z9ls497804anb.3.p; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.190.11 with SMTP id n11mr3818224anf.47.1288232202326; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.190.11 with SMTP id n11mr3818223anf.47.1288232202292; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-gw0-f48.google.com (mail-gw0-f48.google.com [74.125.83.48]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id x38si155175anx.7.2010.10.27.19.16.42; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 74.125.83.48 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of alanpost@sunflowerriver.org) client-ip=74.125.83.48; Received: by gwaa12 with SMTP id a12so329495gwa.7 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.156.5 with SMTP id i5mr618107ybo.288.1288232202007; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sunflowerriver.org (c-68-35-167-179.hsd1.nm.comcast.net [68.35.167.179]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j64sm333254yha.24.2010.10.27.19.16.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:16:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:16:37 -0600 From: ".alyn.post." To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] type/token distinction Message-ID: <20101028021637.GA45035@alice.local> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com References: <20101028005533.GC44377@alice.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 74.125.83.48 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of alanpost@sunflowerriver.org) smtp.mail=alanpost@sunflowerriver.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:29:26PM -0300, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:55 PM, .alyn.post. > wrote: > > Are there words in Lojban specifically covering type/token: > > > > =A0http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type-token_distinction > > > > If not, what are the closest words for this kind of > > instance/class, member/set distinction? > > > > cmima/porsi? >=20 > sucta? >=20 does it make sense to use dacti/sucta together for this? -Alan --=20 .i ko djuno fi le do sevzi --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.