From lojban+bncCICntNPQBRCqirjmBBoEUDzoCQ@googlegroups.com Sun Oct 31 17:09:27 2010 Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PChxl-00067n-4S; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 17:09:27 -0700 Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28sf8606228gxk.16 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 17:09:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:mime-version :received:received:date:in-reply-to:x-ip:references:user-agent :x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=OAz70B5gvnpyWLgmSx2S56khb3bGvWagM/0zw+a9koM=; b=0rKts5TRNzTRC1Sk8FJXNazYWuCmkdZ0qLwCjs83UjCR7wzwwgV6HX9AsYGULISqND Bw10GQ0XMa/TDDeDSFlKF/0arUOcuHscDpNuEv7ikSCmIrE/+J4ef3p/quJUzED5Zxbr A2GFtkXjYK1pYgj0/ZN/xaX5KErQGbTukO4L4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:x-ip:references :user-agent:x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=XxZZVVjVkbrcHOUR3H0BXpFnt7KdzdCcLjMFu2L2pw93D+KTMSPfJyT0YTN7Rm87AB jR+vbYn+lu2W25AHvYhmqobY3zNCTtqkeEzf52AjXTcqyVWwo+Wqe6EFScxtrLyfpPuQ et4WBOkbu88Nmid/KuwSx/7LrpkJjAf3N5gKA= Received: by 10.90.79.20 with SMTP id c20mr201602agb.53.1288570154280; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 17:09:14 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.90.62.37 with SMTP id k37ls740521aga.2.p; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 17:09:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.50.29 with SMTP id c29mr546110agk.13.1288570153614; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 17:09:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 32g2000yqz.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 17:09:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 17:09:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <839237.99689.qm@web81303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-IP: 32.172.116.208 References: <20101031173116.GX1105@digitalkingdom.org> <20101031195943.GR8367@nvg.org> <20101031200157.GD1105@digitalkingdom.org> <20101031211948.GF1105@digitalkingdom.org> <20101031213123.GG1105@digitalkingdom.org> <839237.99689.qm@web81303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Ubuntu/10.04 (lucid) Firefox/3.6.12,gzip(gfe) Message-ID: Subject: [lojban] Re: cu-alike for other situations From: Lindar To: lojban X-Original-Sender: lindarthebard@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Huh... I hate it. It makes sense, it's probably very useful, I'll probably back it, but I hate it... a lot. IMO should be a different word (I already have trouble understanding what's been said when I hear {cu broda cu brode}, so making it a different word would be nice. Maybe {qu} could be used? =D I'd like to, before we jump into anything, see if {vau} doesn't solve your problems for this purpose, but it sounds like a decent idea. It would serve to further differentiate the already existent dialects. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.