From lojban+bncCJ2UzZHuDRC9ksvmBBoEWxRMOw@googlegroups.com Thu Nov 04 07:55:09 2010 Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PE1DV-0008Ai-HI; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 07:55:09 -0700 Received: by wyb38 with SMTP id 38sf1212847wyb.16 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 07:54:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VvhLXDXFdeaJM0hmlhj5hpXtvrCQtjFDebl1dj5gbTI=; b=2P9in1GYsBuncvvV3auwOmZHTy+cTk0/8QK/5FLI3+T8fcHgbKUOG9QDG3S7SCjTOQ EilL0YbssSb8rUbQXpDvhn+L/HSLvFdYPJ8eBXFFTV1kfInhRWngSB05GRUYMjkeeDMd uFtBtZqleVqz4Aec7dBthTYKwfQ+Ma2hnrgT8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=4OoOa+rbOWeWUNdfpDF9ZP0/kb7ZrKFGwfq6968FocX6YImuMw6NPM2HeIO7NBksP3 q7OotQ6RinhwRPUO9ga1MXyD1idtcFp/02Zltf8nr8409AYsBp2hOlGTh4Dn8U28ma5C uJzm7XdVQSeUCjReo5PYEaJ6aifbAQATs9goc= Received: by 10.216.237.35 with SMTP id x35mr99075weq.5.1288882493723; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 07:54:53 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.68.139 with SMTP id l11ls687065wed.0.p; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 07:54:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.90.138 with SMTP id e10mr111083wef.4.1288882492238; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 07:54:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.90.138 with SMTP id e10mr111082wef.4.1288882492220; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 07:54:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com (mail-ww0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id a52si8308wer.8.2010.11.04.07.54.51; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 07:54:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.49 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.49; Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15so2168025wwe.30 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 07:54:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.151.69 with SMTP id b5mr829009wbw.168.1288882489958; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 07:54:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.32.140 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 07:54:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 11:54:49 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Another comic (Again!) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.49 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Michael Turniansky wrote: > 2010/11/1 Jorge Llamb=EDas : >> >> I would make the answer "lo djedi be li su'e re ji'i ci" >> > =A0I agree with the question change, but as I'm sure you know (and > disagree with), xorxes, CLL 18.9.2 says your answer means "no more > than approximately 23 days" (20-approximately 3). Yes, for me "ji'i" is in the same class with "za'u", "me'i", "su'o" and "su'e". I don't think of "ji'i" as being in a world of its own. When it comes to choosing between being consistent with the rest of the language, or being consistent with some random offcial rule, I tend to lean towards the former. >=A0I'd say "bi'i", not "ji'i". I never remember whether "PA bi'i PA" is supposed to be an interval, some value in that interval, or either. If you use "bi'i" you should probably move the "su'e too: "(re) bi'i (su'e ci)". mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.