From lojban+bncCK7Yk5CUCxDu35TnBBoEhDBxdg@googlegroups.com Thu Nov 18 05:54:06 2010 Received: from mail-qw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PJ4w7-000625-9y; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 05:54:06 -0800 Received: by qwh5 with SMTP id 5sf4677503qwh.16 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 05:53:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Vlx8DzmcwNg4UTAVH8nOP5tDZwFNUwkuY1W7cwelhbA=; b=KpHdN1n+ZV51n0R+5wE1L3c8m8omYIqOiqiNqe9/CaelPJU6+YxAjtsR1hcfcqksEO 8B7vDxLBZKmpvpFuN2DqAgpi91CU1fuij7usqKpYVb8ns+L5+5m+J/QNbaCk5iBls9fq rO9Ig070RViDxrWd0SB21GHGym1JEDkBxvmhI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from :to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=sD4rLlJG4a25O7iIfDCfzGu99Co+x3Lzyx6LhDm76FKhagR6Tzr7nxL570QqRcUTvq A5z2Ov2PSpyCqKpDcxamcI9RB0HPFi6Ctqs46nMz2vaYFUrfuAj9G78XDcaWzFlJionI 47P1TlP7yGoo18cjb/ppmQNSK0XzlYuJ04nLA= Received: by 10.229.2.96 with SMTP id 32mr40752qci.0.1290088430887; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 05:53:50 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.229.80.196 with SMTP id u4ls594638qck.0.p; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 05:53:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.249.209 with SMTP id ml17mr68442qcb.16.1290088429888; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 05:53:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.249.209 with SMTP id ml17mr68441qcb.16.1290088429840; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 05:53:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com (mail-qy0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id j6si78243qcu.2.2010.11.18.05.53.48; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 05:53:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.181 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.181; Received: by mail-qy0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 2so1043949qyk.19 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 05:53:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.189.140 with SMTP id de12mr640771qcb.5.1290088427696; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 05:53:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.226.15 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 05:53:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:53:47 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: [lojban] {ziltau} vs {taurpau} From: Remo Dentato To: lojban X-Original-Sender: rdentato@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.181 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rdentato@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 We had a long discussion on IRC about {ziltau} to be the generic word for part of a tanru. At that time the decision was to use {ziltau} but I'm still not sure. I remember that one of the arguement was that {ziltau} was the term used in the grammar but I couldn't find it in the BNF (neither in the PEG) grammar. On the other hand, {taurpau} suggested by Pierre seems a very sensible lujvo. Could we all get to an agreement? Remo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.