From lojban+bncCK30vq5WEIK1q-cEGgQOv6It@googlegroups.com Mon Nov 22 13:03:18 2010 Received: from mail-px0-f189.google.com ([209.85.212.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PKdXa-0000Vw-Fo; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:03:17 -0800 Received: by pxi19 with SMTP id 19sf604929pxi.16 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:03:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; bh=l8gqNZ0/hDD9kTJEYO79sQz55siE6Mg+FkGP1ju7oqo=; b=B/gM2kqvqtnLZc3qw/oJBNUWPsSuFwNXMJ37pUWBdbI8Ljb/TxNX0RCSOPi/4ACUvv n/ReG3VtKXFwF/ffhIpKLl4elqsUJqoIAaiFl/Cp14ffsTGvIODneaL6TZYhLMWDNueE Fbvhg/JDnfZq7Tj+D4zxADBx5gRz5lfBN2tdk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; b=7Eb16FoUWbwM1hnxuCZRXQC76hEwfzQlcPYRk9TgG0dg/dVE01NnclXXe120uHp9d9 WdB0W7oETgHYPUm3Zld1ueg8crfLrDdXn5f0evkumadKNSw1Eix3YetUUdpzl83N2xJx 6DDIQP8iigHAitN7/usdwJooW2v/PX1dt2hag= Received: by 10.142.196.9 with SMTP id t9mr293332wff.67.1290459778513; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:02:58 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.142.249.41 with SMTP id w41ls1635689wfh.1.p; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:02:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.140.10 with SMTP id n10mr3964651wfd.72.1290459777431; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:02:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.140.10 with SMTP id n10mr3964650wfd.72.1290459777406; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:02:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org (digitalkingdom.org [173.13.139.234]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id f13si8145018wfo.0.2010.11.22.13.02.57; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:02:57 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.234 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.234; Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PKdXM-0000Ub-4L for lojban@googlegroups.com; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:02:56 -0800 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:02:56 -0800 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [lojban-announcements] Re: Lojban Web Programming Help? Message-ID: <20101122210255.GE9301@digitalkingdom.org> References: <20101120001959.GE9301@digitalkingdom.org> <3bef85c9-8913-473d-b979-78631e81546e@q36g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> <20101121225935.GC5638@alice.local> <20101121230542.GW9301@digitalkingdom.org> <20101122000542.GD5638@alice.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20101122000542.GD5638@alice.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 05:05:43PM -0700, .alyn.post. wrote: > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 03:05:42PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > Which is a lot more than I expected, given my usual total > > inability to get anyone to do anything around here. Very > > encouraging, I guess. > > Are you willing to talk about what the next step is? If so, what > is the next step? Well, the main point for me is: "If someone (me, anybody else, whatever) works on jvs2, will I end up stuck with responsibility for fixing it because everyone else hates what it's written in?", which is exactly what happened with jvs1. This was then further divided into two parts: 1. If I get a bee in my bonnet and start writing one myself, what languages should I avoid? 2. Will there be other people to work on the Python/Flask thing donri has secretly started, since I don't know Python? The next step, basically, is for someone to actually go write something. :) If you're interested, you might want to talk to donri about what he's done so far. -Robin -- http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.