From lojban+bncCML0xpmUARDWprXnBBoExTOyhg@googlegroups.com Wed Nov 24 10:03:17 2010 Received: from mail-px0-f189.google.com ([209.85.212.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PLJgW-0006MU-SO; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:03:17 -0800 Received: by pxi19 with SMTP id 19sf4541pxi.16 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:03:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=VWDLGHGFQkHaC4XHDKTuBeUEMWhlxTC7Ifsw8EiCTpQ=; b=LZoRSluLAUZJ0OEYsCswzmRIhG8N32EIoI4DJwBT3e5SC3ajTWemfT9myB7LNRK8RX 5fPIFEGEPWlR9FAKWXqPWA5xY/6/gXoL6ZvjyYVDtnqPj7gpqmqyX3qAM/xHmTwln61K D1TQjZDmQvWuLQKiqptOhNoiBEH9LTVoS3oII= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=UvKHCe812/VN0T0y082Z2sC1atHILfw2keFSHHsfu8sS0mForAucAak1wBUb2gp+HZ ea5LQigWK5HrGOg+U7IMWO68H2kAhkoAnak1Jqox5NaMmCl7m+ENDZOgkvf/dqXzw5dd d4URE6fKzHHy0oVZjuKTGsk5zYsQlcAX8BZho= Received: by 10.143.26.38 with SMTP id d38mr505819wfj.38.1290621782337; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:03:02 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.142.249.41 with SMTP id w41ls1424233wfh.1.p; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:03:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.241.16 with SMTP id o16mr1898519wfh.29.1290621781378; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:03:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.241.16 with SMTP id o16mr1898515wfh.29.1290621781329; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:03:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pv0-f177.google.com (mail-pv0-f177.google.com [74.125.83.177]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id n6si10783897wfl.7.2010.11.24.10.03.00; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:03:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.177 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.83.177; Received: by mail-pv0-f177.google.com with SMTP id 7so5140pvg.8 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:03:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.188.17 with SMTP id l17mr8990695wff.35.1290621780154; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:03:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.86.1 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:03:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <486248.13851.qm@web81308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <99731.9603.qm@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <54925.23614.qm@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <486248.13851.qm@web81308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:03:00 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Describing a predicate as a predicate From: Ian Johnson To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: blindbravado@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.177 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=blindbravado@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2dfa4bed8a00495d04cb5 --000e0cd2dfa4bed8a00495d04cb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Exactly. {.i klama} in the context {.i klama .i ...} is entirely different from {zo klama}. On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:52 PM, John E Clifford wrote: > Dubious (well, dubito). I take it {} are word quotes, but then you are > saying that the word standing alone is a relation with all of its arguments > indifferent. But that is not the word along, it is the word alone *taken as > a sentence*, which is not, I think, the point here, > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Luke Bergen > *To:* lojban@googlegroups.com > *Sent:* Wed, November 24, 2010 11:47:09 AM > > *Subject:* Re: [lojban] Describing a predicate as a predicate > > That's not true at all. {klama} = {zo'e klama zo'e zo'e zo'e zo'e} no? > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:06 PM, John E Clifford wrote: > >> Whoa! 'klama' is not a bridi but a selbri. So making the appropriate >> substitution ought to get it right, whether it is what is wanted is >> unclear. >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ---- >> From: John E Clifford >> To: lojban@googlegroups.com >> Sent: Wed, November 24, 2010 11:03:53 AM >> Subject: Re: [lojban] Describing a predicate as a predicate >> >> I suppose 'lo mu terbri' "five terms-serving-as-arguments" >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ---- >> From: purpleposeidon >> To: lojban@googlegroups.com >> Sent: Wed, November 24, 2010 10:40:47 AM >> Subject: Re: [lojban] Describing a predicate as a predicate >> >> {zo klama bridi fi mu terbri}, {zo klama bridi fi mu lo ro terbri}? >> >> On 11/24/10, Ian Johnson wrote: >> > {lo si'o broda} expands to {lo si'o zo'e broda zo'e ...}. I don't want >> the >> > idea involved in a proposition involving broda, a proposition involving >> > broda, etc. I want to be talking about broda as a predicate. >> > >> > I don't actually know how to take {mu da} and put it into a sequence or >> set >> > (short of using a vast excess of {ce'o} or {ce}), so unfortunately this >> has >> > to be in English: >> > >> > The predicate "klama" takes five arguments. >> > >> > Anyway, {la'e zo} works. I had that idea before coming to this actually >> but >> > I suspected for some reason that it might give me a concrete object. >> Nice to >> > know that it doesn't, and that this isn't all that hard to do. >> > >> > .i ki'e .i mu'o mi'e latros. >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Michael Turniansky >> > wrote: >> > >> >> I'm having real trouble understanding what you mean by "the predicate >> >> itself as an abstract concept". You can certainly find the idea of >> broda >> >> intersting - "lo si'o broda cu cinri", but I expect that's not what you >> >> mean? Is there any way you can put your abstract example into a more >> >> concrete one? >> >> --gejyspa >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Ian Johnson >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Is there a way to take a selbri and make a sumti that is not "an x1 of >> >>> broda" but simply "broda"; like "broda is interesting", having not to >> do >> >>> with an event, proposition, etc. of broda, but just the predicate >> itself, >> >>> as >> >>> an abstract concept? About the only idea I have is to use {lo selbri >> be >> >>> fa >> >>> zo broda} which seems like a pretty terrible way of doing it. >> >>> >> >>> mu'o mi'e latros. >> >>> >> >> -- >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> >> "lojban" group. >> >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com >> >> > >> >> . >> >> For more options, visit this group at >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> >> >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> > "lojban" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com >> . >> > For more options, visit this group at >> > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> > >> > >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "lojban" group. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "lojban" group. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "lojban" group. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --000e0cd2dfa4bed8a00495d04cb5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Exactly. {.i klama} in the context {.i klama .i ...} is entirely different = from {zo klama}.

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at = 12:52 PM, John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:
Du= bious (well, dubito).=A0 I take it {} are word quotes, but then you are say= ing that the word standing alone is a relation with all of its arguments in= different.=A0 But that is not the word along, it is the word alone *taken a= s a sentence*, which is not, I think, the point here,


From: Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.co= m>
To: lojban@googlegroups.c= om
Sent: Wed, November 24, 20= 10 11:47:09 AM

Subject: Re: [lojban] Describing a predicate as a= predicate

That's not true at all. =A0{klama} =3D {zo'e klama zo'e zo'= e zo'e zo'e} no?

On Wed, Nov 24, = 2010 at 12:06 PM, John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.co= m> wrote:
Whoa! =A0'kla= ma' is not a bridi but a selbri. =A0So making the appropriate
substitution ought to get it right, whether it is what is wanted is unclear= .



----- Original Message ----
From: John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, November 24, 2010 11:03:53 AM
Subject: Re: [lojban] Describing a predicate as a predicate

I suppose 'lo mu terbri' =A0"five terms-serving-as-arguments&q= uot;



----- Original Message ----
From: purpleposeidon <purpleposeidon@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, November 24, 2010 10:40:47 AM
Subject: Re: [lojban] Describing a predicate as a predicate

{zo klama bridi fi mu terbri}, {zo klama bridi fi mu lo ro terbri}?

On 11/24/10, Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote:
> {lo si'o broda} expands to {lo si'o zo'e broda zo'e ..= .}. I don't want the
> idea involved in a proposition involving broda, a proposition involvin= g
> broda, etc. I want to be talking about broda as a predicate.
>
> I don't actually know how to take {mu da} and put it into a sequen= ce or set
> (short of using a vast excess of {ce'o} or {ce}), so unfortunately= this has
> to be in English:
>
> The predicate "klama" takes five arguments.
>
> Anyway, {la'e zo} works. I had that idea before coming to this act= ually but
> I suspected for some reason that it might give me a concrete object. N= ice to
> know that it doesn't, and that this isn't all that hard to do.=
>
> .i ki'e .i mu'o mi'e latros.
>
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Michael Turniansky
> <mturniansky@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> =A0I'm having real trouble understanding what you mean by =A0&= quot;the predicate
>> itself as an abstract concept". =A0 You can certainly find th= e idea of broda
>> intersting - "lo si'o broda cu cinri", but I expect = that's not what you
>> mean? =A0Is there any way you can put your abstract example into a= more
>> concrete one?
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0--gejyspa
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Ian Johnson
>> <blindbravado@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a way to take a selbri and make a sumti that is not &= quot;an x1 of
>>> broda" but simply "broda"; like "broda is = interesting", having not to do
>>> with an event, proposition, etc. of broda, but just the predic= ate itself,
>>> as
>>> an abstract concept? About the only idea I have is to use {lo = selbri be
>>> fa
>>> zo broda} which seems like a pretty terrible way of doing it.<= br> >>>
>>> mu'o mi'e latros.
>>>
>> =A0--
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google= Groups
>> "lojban" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<lojban%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro= ups
> "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.=
>
>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed t= o the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--000e0cd2dfa4bed8a00495d04cb5--