From lojban+bncCIywt_XDCRCBurXnBBoE5JldcQ@googlegroups.com Wed Nov 24 10:44:31 2010 Received: from mail-yx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.213.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PLKKQ-00006a-DZ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:44:31 -0800 Received: by yxn35 with SMTP id 35sf37430yxn.16 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:44:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:message-id:x-ymail-osg:received :x-mailer:references:date:from:subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=OCZz3F2tbRK40TDUPGl6EILaXxAq2e4DBc8FQZVa9ls=; b=DskBZ+90wZUCvGKKZuE+klj8e3AwX1AEYLPEfe/UYcDvBXM0/HehlxIAq3dsq6occ4 u0vWfxT8yrQdspnGpwCufnCCVsA4SIK2uubwlU4onOQV63J3p6QVqwPR4EE501iJKoCK 5xqEFBVt8kBOmWCQaWRrfI0zMyrljXTo8NYGY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:x-ymail-osg:x-mailer:references :date:from:subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=g6Y5AIiHXwNlpUTcEmZmkkTBSRMh2q32IzhEybOl0Eb2iK3bkG8NTSV1IFxXOPQ0Ve nEWfLLItV4/imOje5P+CQ7VxvNE+8ves2E20NfDoi7C/MNsQa7XNqNFW5aVfRD7EOdTa jTxSuhxQCPFvH2X9Fq3h9oyzIYGmbZ+1KCumg= Received: by 10.150.68.35 with SMTP id q35mr115576yba.12.1290624257294; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:44:17 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.100.102.9 with SMTP id z9ls200379anb.3.p; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:44:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.120.20 with SMTP id s20mr1696296anc.24.1290624255860; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:44:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.120.20 with SMTP id s20mr1696295anc.24.1290624255793; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:44:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from web81308.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web81308.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.199.124]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id b3si1744250ana.6.2010.11.24.10.44.14; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:44:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 68.142.199.124 as permitted sender) client-ip=68.142.199.124; Received: (qmail 48832 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Nov 2010 18:44:14 -0000 Message-ID: <219450.48017.qm@web81308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: n3Mwxy4VM1nwQq3Vd9wliAfu.9f1fdFuTNA0PLguQq8iylS uvFvrxZWb38PLb.ledymoL8w4nhh3AkgmKWOUEs6_gpbP9RB_xLr1lsx0yAz tTQ9RFSBCHMIdmAZjCBpsNw5NT9zcJhOUkt6tY8_DdI4A3BRqQdXeI_UgNUu xtAh7m8JhxHSYOlmqjXB4EiRlsxx0V12ojWvRYzIMiW2qkT75rmPxK2X6h2p qWOTMDP17SqplcpJLRgrqyMX169Ei_ZpzN0_CI.HM3NKESr1lYVg0Nd3ZCys DlE3GNbmmHYkK.xJWGkF.3C0QNKJxssY4aWV9ozYGiYv1ypO4VOEv5DQ99yl M2bRP6b5pgVX5yhq3TY5ghvlWcc7EOPJX9ZgFsM2FeM3t.lSCv3VxYvCmpQ- - Received: from [99.92.110.13] by web81308.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:44:14 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/553 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 References: <99731.9603.qm@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <54925.23614.qm@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <25796.45352.qm@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:44:14 -0800 (PST) From: John E Clifford Subject: Re: [lojban] Describing a predicate as a predicate To: lojban@googlegroups.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 68.142.199.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1805849733-1290624254=:48017" --0-1805849733-1290624254=:48017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 That's the extension of a term, in this case a predicate: the set of all things that satisfy the predicate, so, in the case of 'klama' a set of quintuples of objects, places, places, routes between aforementioned places, and modes of transportation, such that the first is going from the second to the third along the fourth by means of the fifth. That is also a five-place relation, if you want to say that the referent should be a relation. ________________________________ From: Ian Johnson To: lojban@googlegroups.com Sent: Wed, November 24, 2010 12:03:58 PM Subject: Re: [lojban] Describing a predicate as a predicate Wait, why would the referent of {klama} be a set? And what would it contain? On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:46 PM, John E Clifford wrote: You need to remind me what 'la'e' does then, since I thought it got to the referent of a word, which would not be a relation but a set. If the word is not the predicate, what do we call the word -- without going into Logjamese? > > > > ________________________________ From: Ian Johnson >To: lojban@googlegroups.com >Sent: Wed, November 24, 2010 11:16:52 AM > >Subject: Re: [lojban] Describing a predicate as a predicate > > >At this discussion in general: a word is not a predicate. You need a {la'e} to >extract a predicate from a word that can represent a predicate, pe'i. > >mu'o mi'e latros. > > >On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:06 PM, John E Clifford wrote: > >Whoa! 'klama' is not a bridi but a selbri. So making the appropriate >>substitution ought to get it right, whether it is what is wanted is unclear. >> >> >> >> >>----- Original Message ---- >>From: John E Clifford >>To: lojban@googlegroups.com >> >>Sent: Wed, November 24, 2010 11:03:53 AM >>Subject: Re: [lojban] Describing a predicate as a predicate >> >>I suppose 'lo mu terbri' "five terms-serving-as-arguments" >> >> >> >>----- Original Message ---- >>From: purpleposeidon >>To: lojban@googlegroups.com >>Sent: Wed, November 24, 2010 10:40:47 AM >>Subject: Re: [lojban] Describing a predicate as a predicate >> >>{zo klama bridi fi mu terbri}, {zo klama bridi fi mu lo ro terbri}? >> >>On 11/24/10, Ian Johnson wrote: >>> {lo si'o broda} expands to {lo si'o zo'e broda zo'e ...}. I don't want the >>> idea involved in a proposition involving broda, a proposition involving >>> broda, etc. I want to be talking about broda as a predicate. >>> >>> I don't actually know how to take {mu da} and put it into a sequence or set >>> (short of using a vast excess of {ce'o} or {ce}), so unfortunately this has >>> to be in English: >>> >>> The predicate "klama" takes five arguments. >>> >>> Anyway, {la'e zo} works. I had that idea before coming to this actually but >>> I suspected for some reason that it might give me a concrete object. Nice to >>> know that it doesn't, and that this isn't all that hard to do. >>> >>> .i ki'e .i mu'o mi'e latros. >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Michael Turniansky >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm having real trouble understanding what you mean by "the predicate >>>> itself as an abstract concept". You can certainly find the idea of broda >>>> intersting - "lo si'o broda cu cinri", but I expect that's not what you >>>> mean? Is there any way you can put your abstract example into a more >>>> concrete one? >>>> --gejyspa >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Ian Johnson >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Is there a way to take a selbri and make a sumti that is not "an x1 of >>>>> broda" but simply "broda"; like "broda is interesting", having not to do >>>>> with an event, proposition, etc. of broda, but just the predicate itself, >>>>> as >>>>> an abstract concept? About the only idea I have is to use {lo selbri be >>>>> fa >>>>> zo broda} which seems like a pretty terrible way of doing it. >>>>> >>>>> mu'o mi'e latros. >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>> "lojban" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com >>>> . >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "lojban" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>> >>> >> >>-- >>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>"lojban" group. >>To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>For more options, visit this group at >>http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> >> >> >> >>-- >>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>"lojban" group. >>To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>For more options, visit this group at >>http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> >> >> >> >>-- >> >>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>"lojban" group. >>To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>For more options, visit this group at >>http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> >> > -- > >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"lojban" group. >To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >For more options, visit this group at >http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > -- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"lojban" group. >To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >For more options, visit this group at >http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0-1805849733-1290624254=:48017 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
That's the extension of a term, in this case a predicate:= the set of all things that satisfy the predicate, so, in the case of 'klam= a' a set of quintuples of objects, places, places, routes between aforement= ioned places, and modes of transportation, such that the first is going fro= m the second to the third along the fourth by means of the fifth. That is a= lso a five-place relation, if you want to say that the referent should be a= relation.

From: Ian Joh= nson <blindbravado@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, November 24, 2010 12:03:58 PM
Subject: Re: [lojban] Describing = a predicate as a predicate

Wait, why would the referent of {klama} be a set? And what would it contain= ?
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:46 PM, John E Cl= ifford <kali9p= utra@yahoo.com> wrote:
You need to remind me what 'la'e' does then, since I thought it got to t= he referent of a word, which would not be a relation but a set.  If th= e word is not the predicate, what do we call the word -- without going into= Logjamese?


<= b>From: Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, November 24, 2010 11:16:52 AM

Subj= ect: Re: [lojban] Describing a predicate as a predicate

At this discussion in general: a word is not a predicate. You need a {la'e}= to extract a predicate from a word that can represent a predicate, pe'i.
mu'o mi'e latros.

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:06 PM, John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com> wr= ote:
Whoa!  'klama' is not a bridi but a selbri.  So making the approp= riate
substitution ought to get it right, whether it is what is wanted is unclear= .



----- Original Message ----
From: John E Clifford <kali9putr= a@yahoo.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com=
Sent: Wed, November 24, 2010 11:03:53 AM
Subject: Re: [lojban] Describing a predicate as a predicate

I suppose 'lo mu terbri'  "five terms-serving-as-arguments"



----- Original Message ----
From: purpleposeidon <pu= rpleposeidon@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com=
Sent: Wed, November 24, 2010 10:40:47 AM
Subject: Re: [lojban] Describing a predicate as a predicate

{zo klama bridi fi mu terbri}, {zo klama bridi fi mu lo ro terbri}?

On 11/24/10, Ian Johnson <bl= indbravado@gmail.com> wrote:
> {lo si'o broda} expands to {lo si'o zo'e broda zo'e ...}. I don't want= the
> idea involved in a proposition involving broda, a proposition involvin= g
> broda, etc. I want to be talking about broda as a predicate.
>
> I don't actually know how to take {mu da} and put it into a sequence o= r set
> (short of using a vast excess of {ce'o} or {ce}), so unfortunately thi= s has
> to be in English:
>
> The predicate "klama" takes five arguments.
>
> Anyway, {la'e zo} works. I had that idea before coming to this actuall= y but
> I suspected for some reason that it might give me a concrete object. N= ice to
> know that it doesn't, and that this isn't all that hard to do.
>
> .i ki'e .i mu'o mi'e latros.
>
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Michael Turniansky
> <mturniansky@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>  I'm having real trouble understanding what you mean by  = ;"the predicate
>> itself as an abstract concept".   You can certainly find the = idea of broda
>> intersting - "lo si'o broda cu cinri", but I expect that's not wha= t you
>> mean?  Is there any way you can put your abstract example int= o a more
>> concrete one?
>>          --gejyspa
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Ian Johnson
>> <
blindbravado@gmail= .com>wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a way to take a selbri and make a sumti that is not "= an x1 of
>>> broda" but simply "broda"; like "broda is interesting", having= not to do
>>> with an event, proposition, etc. of broda, but just the predic= ate itself,
>>> as
>>> an abstract concept? About the only idea I have is to use {lo = selbri be
>>> fa
>>> zo broda} which seems like a pretty terrible way of doing it.<= br> >>>
>>> mu'o mi'e latros.
>>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google= Groups
>> "lojban" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<lojban%2Bunsubscribe@= googlegroups.com>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.<= br> >>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro= ups
> "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. >
>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
l= ojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
l= ojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed t= o the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegro= ups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegro= ups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegro= ups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0-1805849733-1290624254=:48017--