From lojban+bncCIywt_XDCRCfzMXnBBoEWLFXwg@googlegroups.com Sat Nov 27 12:12:29 2010 Received: from mail-yx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.213.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PMR8D-00079e-Gu; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:12:28 -0800 Received: by yxn35 with SMTP id 35sf2603112yxn.16 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:12:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:message-id:x-ymail-osg:received :x-mailer:references:date:from:subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=J9JzyI66qds/oFprag+yns1Jb4gI5C5196ynk1dYDk8=; b=oa58vdmtOb2+2rbifL8070jYWcjkOWNF0VIwKiqvxSG+uvNzJUjI95p+2sszzvwVS0 POKK+fQ7ydNEe7qLOuEbbgjsuxYGniB0jmLhJy+Y+N0eNzHR0LxRylQAqupajfAfQ19j gMA5bqanzQFOxlGSlY73300iqjPY8sp5spMhI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:x-ymail-osg:x-mailer:references :date:from:subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=x8mucFXDYZ6PILkN2bXsGsH2iNkcbLZKIYQZdqhp/uA0lcjK6uCDs1HE9XCPXBCMpC +cW4OQo9DsfOwcs2XSeQJz/boOk5YI2prqfqH8akGzY/xbbtmtw6ajh4aEVmfp1VxnFw zOCBP6t4icM2+gn5EvEGmljZVmmUypt8oj7+o= Received: by 10.150.4.36 with SMTP id 36mr478478ybd.47.1290888735784; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:12:15 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.100.102.9 with SMTP id z9ls807259anb.3.p; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:12:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.231.10 with SMTP id d10mr676244anh.18.1290888734868; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:12:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.231.10 with SMTP id d10mr676243anh.18.1290888734817; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:12:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.199.118]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id a26si319603ana.5.2010.11.27.12.12.13; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:12:13 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 68.142.199.118 as permitted sender) client-ip=68.142.199.118; Received: (qmail 93541 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Nov 2010 20:12:12 -0000 Message-ID: <492732.93430.qm@web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 6DtNrUcVM1nfHu_ot.vANJjoR_VMSkJtKI7MjkmuQ99.kOM R59BWZTRYDTw7NGozKZaxoVlvJKW0SgrwC6CLZZh1MdomDt424y72SpJbmNj dlHvhapL5iBvYfcHIMGMzRrRxketZIATESfhJr94eCO6piH74P7ubn.xcnQS npqyBVLD49jIwTLbAnoLJQIhSKxLavCGZEZNzH608UR59Kg0Y2lZIGPC9JVz JXCGnFZnHODVUaDD4OMRR._8pwh4.FEDQ8fQCcJ9MEE.9FWKJ1SgybJZgxtL jpsRkwPBGjdSKOwEbngDWxoE9PDCNyFG9VJgFrdY4icMbFIZeYj0LVb..L8. lcNBhF71F4H50G5QpLPLAic6GBVqxOVGia_.PVDEoxmqV..oPmUk97nHz Received: from [99.92.110.13] by web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:12:12 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/553 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 References: Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:12:12 -0800 (PST) From: John E Clifford Subject: Re: [lojban] Time for the perenial other-centric-.ui conversation To: lojban@googlegroups.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 68.142.199.118 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-596449330-1290888732=:93430" --0-596449330-1290888732=:93430 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Well, this raises the interesting OT issue of what exactly something like "peekaboo" is linguistically. It seems to be related to "taDA" and magicians' exclamations when the the trick comes off, but it seems to have a bit more content than some attention getter in COI, since the seeing is vital. And, of course, I am not sure what the linguistic status of the supposedly similar things is either. Come to think of it, there is a double seeing here -- the child sees the parent again and the parent sees the child ("I see you" maybe left over from its origin in a hide-and-seek game). "Surprise" seems to be a totally different sort of thing. Or maybe no so different: it too is used to announce the completion of a trick (even if the recipient is not surprised). But it clearly is not, as this note implies, a case of the speaker empathetically experiencing the emotion of the recipient -- the speaker, a part of the party, is not surprised. He might be joyful and also experience some empathetic joy with the recipient, but that isn't surprise. I'd be happy to hear more suggestions about this. I would not be happy to see cmavo used to indicate emotions of a third party not empathized by the speaker. ________________________________ From: Luke Bergen To: "lojban-list@lojban.org" Sent: Sat, November 27, 2010 12:45:47 PM Subject: [lojban] Time for the perenial other-centric-.ui conversation That's actually not what I intend but it is what will inevitably happen. I was talking to my wife who is perpetually freezing and at one point I remembered somehing and wanted to say "oh yeah! Your dad said he was going to make a fire tonight _____". Where "______" was that cool new cmavo of COI that takes a UI before it and somehow applies it to the object of the COI. I've searched around but must be using the wrong search terms. Anybody remember what I'm talking about? What I'm trying to express is something like what you want to express when you play peekaboo with a baby. It's like some kind of .uadai like "surprise!" But it's not a command or an observation, but more of like an expectation. Almost like a .uipeikau if that makes any sense? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0-596449330-1290888732=:93430 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Well, this raises the interesting OT issue of what exactly som= ething like "peekaboo" is linguistically.  It seems to be related to "= taDA" and magicians' exclamations when the the trick comes off, but it seem= s to have a bit more content than some attention getter in COI, since the s= eeing is vital.  And, of course, I am not sure what the linguistic sta= tus of the supposedly similar things is either.  Come to think of it, = there is a double seeing here -- the child sees the parent again and the pa= rent sees the child ("I see you" maybe left over from its origin in a hide-= and-seek game).  "Surprise" seems to be a totally different sort of th= ing. Or maybe no so different: it too is used to announce the completion of= a trick (even if the recipient is not surprised).  But it clearly is not, as this note implies, a case of the speaker empathetically experie= ncing the emotion of the recipient -- the speaker, a part of the party, is = not surprised.  He might be joyful and also experience some empathetic= joy with the recipient, but that isn't surprise. I'd be happy to hear more= suggestions about this.
I would not be happy to see cmavo used to indic= ate emotions of a third party not empathized by the speaker.

<= /div>


From: Luke Bergen <lukeab= ergen@gmail.com>
To:= "lojban-list@lojban.org" <lojban-list@lojban.org>
Sent: Sat, November 27, 2010 12:45:47 PM
Subject: [lojban] T= ime for the perenial other-centric-.ui conversation

That's actually not what I intend but it is what will inevitably happen.=

I was talking to my wife who is perpetually freezing and at one point I = remembered somehing and wanted to say "oh yeah!  Your dad said he was = going to make a fire tonight _____".  Where "______" was that cool new= cmavo of COI that takes a UI before it and somehow applies it to the objec= t of the COI.  I've searched around but must be using the wrong search= terms.  Anybody remember what I'm talking about?

What I'm trying to express is something like what you want to express wh= en you play peekaboo with a baby.  It's like some kind of .uadai like = "surprise!"  But it's not a command or an observation, but more of lik= e an expectation.  Almost like a .uipeikau if that makes any sense?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0-596449330-1290888732=:93430--