From lojban+bncCMHEmaCOBhCx9c_nBBoEmDj4OQ@googlegroups.com Mon Nov 29 11:10:56 2010 Received: from mail-yx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.213.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PN97k-0008Fp-06; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:10:56 -0800 Received: by yxn35 with SMTP id 35sf4137554yxn.16 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:10:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=jWeJOmKbD9e1xVw3u/A1DsmxmPyc+EJ3Cu+5BBb2DJE=; b=34BNtMx/+AaFxRMgWmPAAkkQp1sRzX9kQnJw+0IHqdwL+UwBLVNG3eRNw2HnVPJWcO ArP0P3VWhlyvNEFSFlDkI0eQCJtlbCmZjQdOkW8UEJvQ1cjLWGrt/0UX5Ao/yCnZ5VaP qVK8M1dMB4/uKc8rmc8OtmlIMOr0FPWoRyPWU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=lQ7hXyIwvdeXSQHUV7y8OGGud1OMwpvucGPd6oBDJohq4Xnctp4i3m5y6LV1C7NBQl EgMCQrHAo3ZNz2ornw6MHBeVAfwXUJjAcn/aCT71HnMTEg2oF0sC3emhY55ZKAqRTlKR sopX+k74EF1Xg6sd7IkyqHRUpP8XBXXH9/g1I= Received: by 10.91.113.9 with SMTP id q9mr458125agm.2.1291057842024; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:10:42 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.19.201 with SMTP id c9ls2090250ibb.1.p; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:10:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.19.136 with SMTP id a8mr1703218ibb.19.1291057840976; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:10:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.19.136 with SMTP id a8mr1703217ibb.19.1291057840903; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:10:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-iw0-f171.google.com (mail-iw0-f171.google.com [209.85.214.171]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id m30si1620087ibu.6.2010.11.29.11.10.39; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:10:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.171; Received: by iwn38 with SMTP id 38so810205iwn.2 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:10:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.33.129 with SMTP id h1mr6021613ibd.158.1291057839685; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:10:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.207.65 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:10:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <306693.13766.qm@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <659354.26852.qm@web81304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <604115.16202.qm@web81305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <752705.36302.qm@web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <822423.65423.qm@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <605319.19000.qm@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <433664.89554.qm@web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <906301.34622.qm@web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <306693.13766.qm@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:10:39 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Time for the perenial other-centric-.ui conversation From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325574a52eb42d7049635d3f3 --000325574a52eb42d7049635d3f3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:06 AM, John E Clifford wrote: > But whether 'iepei' is a legitimate question is not thereby decided; it > means "Yes, innit" No, it means, "Do you agree, and with what intensity do you (dis)agree?" -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --000325574a52eb42d7049635d3f3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:06 AM, John E Clifford= <kali9putra@y= ahoo.com> wrote:
But whether 'iepei' is a= legitimate question is not thereby decided; it means "Yes, innit"= ;

=A0
No, it means, "Do you agree, and=A0with what intensity do you (di= s)agree?"

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.
.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. = mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--000325574a52eb42d7049635d3f3--