From lojban+bncCIywt_XDCRCitdDnBBoEyTfsvQ@googlegroups.com Mon Nov 29 13:27:15 2010 Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PNBFb-0003AB-Pb; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:27:15 -0800 Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19sf4228543gxk.16 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:27:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:message-id:x-ymail-osg:received :x-mailer:references:date:from:subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=NLxfHwNqM5ZW1PrCJnopeWHmYkt6KXdt5/wc3EZDqCs=; b=r3mrtJhHg6VT7nXDY+UhhT9zKxVYTmVQU59fYWSjFY8nVzAdlJdZVTWC6Lrhs5YFJd uh9UjkRmg6zXZqUipcHC/+BONDQRls+8CTDqE00T0atGYrIkT/yARiawdcXyBzusiS12 zrznfpmgHFN5xASJbKKtR+CGB+p7sDykSXY7Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:x-ymail-osg:x-mailer:references :date:from:subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=VQ40h4Puhh9uiwYLZ6kfn8REcoLOUg7fidKrcC3wb0OLgOUmzzt8uGs/NxuxRU0Vz1 fsHryQ3VU1TZq3KOBPjYNBOCfLS/Jt9PSP46oBTucVdLjngKEElSOCG4N0Q6iNXJm6vF 2o2x0WQ7HAQUNYHIY+daGYXZIXvAnQDOfJW/E= Received: by 10.150.172.6 with SMTP id u6mr697663ybe.77.1291066018309; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:26:58 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.150.56.35 with SMTP id e35ls3609383yba.5.p; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:26:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.50.14 with SMTP id x14mr1721788ybx.17.1291066017449; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:26:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.50.14 with SMTP id x14mr1721785ybx.17.1291066017113; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:26:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.199.123]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id u10si925284yba.14.2010.11.29.13.26.55; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:26:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 68.142.199.123 as permitted sender) client-ip=68.142.199.123; Received: (qmail 58056 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Nov 2010 21:26:55 -0000 Message-ID: <476795.46183.qm@web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: BcbMHRUVM1l_Jv_oP2bq90xduwuR7KQ9dnhEa1U7evqsL8J ZBcVWUi4FmLhvYntRfCrldcDI77bVa3g6J_BLfGu4JuTKDRPYCAl9zsqfTD6 _KiWs4aU_ys_rqHgKxBLeQDsFNgrQ2E9Bz.obpbgN35VQjUP_nMHJxX.wlX0 46KiGfZrJCkIiOvMY8koAXnTdtsGWUBE3I8n6Hcd7TfNxnIOLxsloy06WYT4 HVJb.Zohxst14GT.WIcz5qhvwY4bJV0RaysEdQUjv4ilsbYGBg_3.8.bxk6p CMj7o8kwcolB7Sja09bhfW2ef8zhkCYuURoiZVYqqLoW1HUyelxBBuk4WIVc 8PZ32Kp5Vk9E7odKzCZycQvhLv1vfR6fO4dV2zf3FE40nsU0yCmK4jLKC.g- - Received: from [99.92.110.13] by web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:26:55 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/553 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 References: <659354.26852.qm@web81304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <604115.16202.qm@web81305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <752705.36302.qm@web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <822423.65423.qm@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <605319.19000.qm@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <433664.89554.qm@web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <906301.34622.qm@web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <306693.13766.qm@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <144450.19864.qm@web81308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <132939.86626.qm@web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <886986.39526.qm@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:26:55 -0800 (PST) From: John E Clifford Subject: Re: [lojban] Time for the perenial other-centric-.ui conversation To: lojban@googlegroups.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 68.142.199.123 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1635982794-1291066015=:46183" --0-1635982794-1291066015=:46183 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 That may be what you (think you) are doing, but it is not what you said. ________________________________ From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com Sent: Mon, November 29, 2010 3:19:33 PM Subject: Re: [lojban] Time for the perenial other-centric-.ui conversation No, it's asking the listener how much the listener agrees. On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:18 PM, John E Clifford wrote: Right, it asking the listener how much the speaker agrees. And that is a proper question, not some fiddle-faddle off in CAI. But a remarkably dumb question in most contexts. It would be better to get a nice snappy way of saying "how much in proper bridi form, rather than the runaround not required, so that one could simply say 'do togni ---?' Maybe that is 'pei' but then it is probably in the wrong selma'o. > > > > ________________________________ From: Jonathan Jones >To: lojban@googlegroups.com >Sent: Mon, November 29, 2010 3:11:08 PM > >Subject: Re: [lojban] Time for the perenial other-centric-.ui conversation > > >Okay, no. Just no. It's "You agree how much?" or "How much do you agree?" It is >asking a question of the listener. Every other question word in Lojban is asking >the LISTENER, not the speaker. {pei} is no different in that respect. > > >On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:58 PM, John E Clifford wrote: > >Well, I didn't say where the idiom strarted but, as I suspected. apparently it >is with 'pei'. 'ie' is not an it, but a mark of agreement. the "yes" of my >version. 'pei' is Lord knows what,. but apparently a question about some of the >things that fall into UI and the like. But what kind of a question i9s it? Not >a "yes/no" clearly, so an identity question. But it doesn't look like an >identity question (or a yes/no one, for that matter) and something that performs >a linguistic function that it is not designed to do is an idiom. 'pei' is in CAI >(I assume), a rough marker of intensity of emotion (or whatever in the flotsam >and jetsam of discursives). The only discursive here is one about MY agreement >-- it can't be anyone else's. So, the whole means "I agree, how much?" or, >presumably, "How much do I agree?" You don't come into it at all. Now, I also >think that using a CAT to ask a factual question is a mistake, but that doesn't >affect the confusion that is involved in this idiom (propagated, it seems, from >the core). >> >> >> >> ________________________________ From: Jonathan Jones >>To: lojban@googlegroups.com >>Sent: Mon, November 29, 2010 1:41:44 PM >> >>Subject: Re: [lojban] Time for the perenial other-centric-.ui conversation >> >> >> >>No, by definition. No idiom needed. Must I quote the definition of {pei} again? >> >>"pei - CAI - emotion ? - attitudinal: attitudinal question; how do you feel >>about it? with what intensity?" >> >>In the case of {.iepei}, the "it" is "agreement": {.iepei} = "how do you feel >>about agreement? with what intensity?" = "Do you agree, and with what intensity >>do you (dis)agree?" >> >>On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:36 PM, John E Clifford wrote: >> >>Idiomatically, yes; literally, more like what I said. And, as I have noted, >>idioms are anti-logical in the appropriate sense, since there is no mechanical >>rule to get them back to there logical form. >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ From: Jonathan Jones >>>To: lojban@googlegroups.com >>>Sent: Mon, November 29, 2010 1:10:39 PM >>> >>>Subject: Re: [lojban] Time for the perenial other-centric-.ui conversation >>> >>> >>> >>>On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:06 AM, John E Clifford wrote: >>> >>>But whether 'iepei' is a legitimate question is not thereby decided; it means >>>"Yes, innit" >>> >>> >>>No, it means, "Do you agree, and with what intensity do you (dis)agree?" >>> >>>-- >>>mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>> >>>.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do >>>zo'o >>>(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>> >>> >>>-- >>>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>"lojban" group. >>>To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>For more options, visit this group at >>>http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>> >>> >>>-- >>>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>"lojban" group. >>>To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>For more options, visit this group at >>>http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>> >> >> >>-- >>mu'o mi'e .aionys. >> >>.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do >>zo'o >>(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >> >>-- >>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>"lojban" group. >>To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>For more options, visit this group at >>http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> >> >>-- >>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>"lojban" group. >>To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>For more options, visit this group at >>http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> > > >-- >mu'o mi'e .aionys. > >.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do >zo'o >(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > >-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"lojban" group. >To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >For more options, visit this group at >http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > >-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"lojban" group. >To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >For more options, visit this group at >http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0-1635982794-1291066015=:46183 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
That may be what you (think you) are doing, but it is not= what you said. 


From:= Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Mon, November 29, 2010 3:19:33 PM
<= span style=3D"font-weight: bold;">Subject: Re: [lojban] Time for= the perenial other-centric-.ui conversation

No, it's asking = the listener how much the listener agrees.

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:18 PM, John E Clifford= <kali9putra@y= ahoo.com> wrote:
Right, it asking the listener how much the speaker agrees.  And t= hat is a proper question, not some fiddle-faddle off in CAI.  But a re= markably dumb question in most contexts.  It would be better to get a = nice snappy way of saying "how much in proper bridi form, rather than the r= unaround not required, so that one could simply say 'do togni ---?'  M= aybe that is 'pei' but then it is probably in the wrong selma'o.


From: Jonathan Jones <<= a rel=3D"nofollow" ymailto=3D"mailto:eyeonus@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank" h= ref=3D"mailto:eyeonus@gmail.com">eyeonus@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Mon, November = 29, 2010 3:11:08 PM=20

Subject:= Re: [lojban] Time for the perenial other-centric-.ui conversation
<= /div>

Okay, no. Just no. It's "You agree how much?" or "How= much do you agree?" It is asking a question of the listener. Every other q= uestion word in Lojban is asking the LISTENER, not the speaker. {pei} is no= different in that respect.

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:58 PM, John E Clifford= <kali9putra@y= ahoo.com> wrote:
Well, I didn't say where the idiom strarted but, as I suspected. appar= ently it is with 'pei'.  'ie' is not an it, but a mark of agreement. t= he "yes" of my version. 'pei' is Lord knows what,. but apparently a questio= n about some of the things that fall into UI and the like.  But what k= ind of a question i9s it? Not a "yes/no" clearly, so an identity question.&= nbsp; But it doesn't look like an identity question (or a yes/no one, for t= hat matter) and something that performs a linguistic function that it is no= t designed to do is an idiom. 'pei' is in CAI (I assume), a rough marker of= intensity of emotion (or whatever in the flotsam and jetsam of discursives= ).  The only discursive here is one about MY agreement -- it can't be = anyone else's.  So, the whole means "I agree, how much?" or, presumabl= y, "How much do I agree?"  You don't come into it at all.  Now, I= also think that using a CAT to ask a factual question is a mistake, but that doesn't affect the confusion that is involved in this idiom (prop= agated, it seems, from the core).


From: Jonathan Jones <<= a rel=3D"nofollow" ymailto=3D"mailto:eyeonus@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank" h= ref=3D"mailto:eyeonus@gmail.com">eyeonus@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Mon, November = 29, 2010 1:41:44 PM=20

Subject: Re: [loj= ban] Time for the perenial other-centric-.ui conversation

No, by definition. No idiom needed. Must I quote the definition of {pe= i} again?

"pei - CAI - emotion ? - attitudinal: attitudinal question= ; how do you feel about it? with what intensity?"
 
In the case of {.iepei}, the "it" is "agreement": {.iepei} =3D "how do= you feel about agreement? with what intensity?" =3D "Do you agree, and&nbs= p;with what intensity do you (dis)agree?"
 
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:36 PM, John E Cliffor= d <kali9putra@= yahoo.com> wrote:
Idiomatically, yes; literally, more like what I said.  And, as I = have noted, idioms are anti-logical in the appropriate sense, since there i= s no mechanical rule to get them back to there logical form.


From: Jonathan Jones <<= a rel=3D"nofollow" ymailto=3D"mailto:eyeonus@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank" h= ref=3D"mailto:eyeonus@gmail.com">eyeonus@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Mon, November 29, 20= 10 1:10:39 PM=20

Subject: Re: [loj= ban] Time for the perenial other-centric-.ui conversation

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:06 AM, John E Clifford= <kali9putra@y= ahoo.com> wrote:
But whether 'iepe= i' is a legitimate question is not thereby decided; it means "Yes, innit"

 
No, it means, "Do you agree, and with what intensity do you (dis)= agree?"

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko= cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo= gle Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegro= ups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G= oogle Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegro= ups.com.
For more options, visit this group at htt= p://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi'e .= aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.= luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D = )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G= oogle Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegro= ups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
=20

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G= oogle Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegro= ups.com.
For more options, visit this group at htt= p://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi'e .= aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.= luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D = )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G= oogle Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegro= ups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
=20

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G= oogle Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegro= ups.com.
For more options, visit this group at htt= p://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi'e .= aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.= luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D = )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0-1635982794-1291066015=:46183--