From lojban+bncCL-Ey5qiChCTj9LnBBoElVzHQQ@googlegroups.com Mon Nov 29 21:12:01 2010 Received: from mail-gy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PNIVS-0003gB-8H; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:12:01 -0800 Received: by gyb11 with SMTP id 11sf4438912gyb.16 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:11:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AQJgqQiCqMl8lOYmALBDxz7OTwhPlVg/nEc9233QNOE=; b=4Tyw4w4V2kWThAWsylqV/6dKlW4hr9S0vdChGcm5n5ungzZqAhtjB1f/7P4sZwGltK S3ASP7nP1VnF8IURW9VPaWsAwy99sjywfPwixhyw89gOiFsk2U+yYHYZSV0pnUMmXWOZ ERmZyXsA7zOtpeBcMeS2dnmxJdgPxHEFreNG4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MsWHBLg+pBPoL5eQ0k5hQ8vEokNboqoRBeiGkX184aYzMFFQQSHltvXvwmuyZk6wXz +kVXs2/yajRSZIfIjhFZGwpJcgyJfUv7C6jnna6aX9AB0fFLMTLM+8EC02t/YkKmnB68 lfakZlKgoCuziqPwxcTvUuPazT1rzLMrubVO4= Received: by 10.90.99.20 with SMTP id w20mr512425agb.34.1291093907929; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:11:47 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.19.201 with SMTP id c9ls2294399ibb.1.p; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:11:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.16.141 with SMTP id o13mr1928442iba.1.1291093907208; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:11:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.16.141 with SMTP id o13mr1928440iba.1.1291093907164; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:11:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-iw0-f178.google.com (mail-iw0-f178.google.com [209.85.214.178]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id cm31si2315227ibb.3.2010.11.29.21.11.46; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:11:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of craigbdaniel@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.178; Received: by mail-iw0-f178.google.com with SMTP id 1so7902517iwn.37 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:11:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.165.202 with SMTP id l10mr1952429icy.488.1291093905073; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:11:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.196.198 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:11:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101130045834.GA27025@digitalkingdom.org> References: <605319.19000.qm@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <433664.89554.qm@web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <906301.34622.qm@web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <306693.13766.qm@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20101130045834.GA27025@digitalkingdom.org> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:11:44 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Time for the perenial other-centric-.ui conversation From: Craig Daniel To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: craigbdaniel@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of craigbdaniel@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=craigbdaniel@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:09:05PM -0500, Oren wrote: >> This lengthy conversation seems like a stark gap in interpretation >> of a moderately used word. Doesn't LLC have some like, official >> example sentence that explains the usage of a word? Isn't this >> what those cmavo definitions are for? It seems really silly to >> watch this go back and forth without any examples. > > You mean LLG. > > I haven't been paying attention, because PC (John Clifford) was > involved, and that's just how I roll. =A0I had been under the > impression they were arguing over the semantics of UI in general, > and potentially new UI in particular. =A0If they're arguing over the > meaning of particular word, which one? Originally, da'oi (an experimental COI some people have proposed). Then it was dai for a while, and now it's mostly pei. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.