From lojban+bncCL-Ey5qiChClltLnBBoE5qMPVw@googlegroups.com Mon Nov 29 21:27:15 2010 Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PNIkC-0004jj-6y; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:27:15 -0800 Received: by ywh1 with SMTP id 1sf4455051ywh.16 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:27:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1eCvntJpYJIGy4z1HK1IDoqnfbj/99QnuzVVSzflAiE=; b=JFIRlQBzD8lIyX57mhng+j2X9kVAZV99T6JJwDbxYQt3PFBW7GCKgeHfQdAn/PYIWm b39w7P0eCC4bNRHnHEc9x+eFoXJP/N14BK+O0vmTzh62w99Fc6zNuA8RnWodj4qQA5eP B9JUk+JI1ey+W7EtR33OrDP+RCgUJ3E8OenKA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CunPzvlt1Mmn5pBTiVfTcurUk2ffRGyOnE2twYgNsvAf5W5+vZiiMi3b72Ry+SH6Cf fIja773g14wQjASfQGdLMZx1ZPC2v+NTCXwCiL0RYAo10mPt1nE5TO7KjhkzSu/3UX6+ TXyhBYuuDHqLIg9OqKrLZ9I2UP4N4K3BZAX7E= Received: by 10.150.162.2 with SMTP id k2mr304975ybe.19.1291094821830; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:27:01 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.76.165 with SMTP id c37ls2302640ibk.3.p; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:27:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.33.71 with SMTP id g7mr168327ibd.6.1291094821274; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:27:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.33.71 with SMTP id g7mr168324ibd.6.1291094821216; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:27:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-iw0-f178.google.com (mail-iw0-f178.google.com [209.85.214.178]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id b32si2320479ibq.1.2010.11.29.21.27.00; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:27:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of craigbdaniel@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.178; Received: by iwn1 with SMTP id 1so7919173iwn.37 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:27:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.219.69 with SMTP id ht5mr1962825icb.354.1291094819707; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:26:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.196.198 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:26:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101130051551.GB27025@digitalkingdom.org> References: <433664.89554.qm@web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <906301.34622.qm@web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <306693.13766.qm@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20101130045834.GA27025@digitalkingdom.org> <20101130051551.GB27025@digitalkingdom.org> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:26:59 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Time for the perenial other-centric-.ui conversation From: Craig Daniel To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: craigbdaniel@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of craigbdaniel@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=craigbdaniel@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:11:44AM -0500, Craig Daniel wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Robin Lee Powell >> wrote: >> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:09:05PM -0500, Oren wrote: >> >> This lengthy conversation seems like a stark gap in >> >> interpretation of a moderately used word. Doesn't LLC have some >> >> like, official example sentence that explains the usage of a >> >> word? Isn't this what those cmavo definitions are for? It seems >> >> really silly to watch this go back and forth without any >> >> examples. >> > >> > You mean LLG. >> > >> > I haven't been paying attention, because PC (John Clifford) was >> > involved, and that's just how I roll. =A0I had been under the >> > impression they were arguing over the semantics of UI in >> > general, and potentially new UI in particular. =A0If they're >> > arguing over the meaning of particular word, which one? >> >> Originally, da'oi (an experimental COI some people have proposed). >> Then it was dai for a while, and now it's mostly pei. > > *nod* > > If someone wants to summarize the confusion over dai and pei and put > it in the appropriate BPFK section, or email it to me, I'd > appreciate the help. On it. But not tonight; I should go to bed. - mi'e .kreig. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.