From lojban+bncCJrK5PGGEBCj69TnBBoEryR6Sw@googlegroups.com Tue Nov 30 09:34:40 2010 Received: from mail-fx0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PNU68-0008Vq-Ok; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:34:40 -0800 Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10sf1488914fxm.16 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:34:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:received:from:organization:to :subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :x-interia-antivirus:x-emid:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=9h+Gbxoe8CExBsBYCL5oG7oNPRgY4sJHT8phyk9K6KA=; b=TQiQXkn8dlpZxUakQFbIqhgZQhEMpDxDQ/VfwtSie1cyz5OcfXMNCaDY3GEY29Gc2G bgP29omOdi+A87LWH7OM9zyzg5Zv21gbEe/IBw66caRqNnA3xyoHM9LMbo/oFmqa9cOY XdxqciH6H2MNOFomTVlqxR+a2/0IthgJ+ADpU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:from:organization:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:x-interia-antivirus:x-emid :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; b=QNgKbvz11IdgDEG8QkqxGVcuO9CA/6gsz868qaGN2FaT1Ror98WGE3vNAkHON6TbsB rhK/1IB0PojgPiaZAFbhhzwog0JBvUYce1w5ODKhypXtDTu7EncbFXABwDfJbDD4r/PQ 4DWbyq1y4czA/NoYw9Yt5YDPfEn4wOLLza7dE= Received: by 10.223.102.143 with SMTP id g15mr347886fao.32.1291138467123; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:34:27 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.49.147 with SMTP id v19ls3453636bkf.1.p; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:34:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.60.84 with SMTP id o20mr854933bkh.7.1291138465757; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:34:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.60.84 with SMTP id o20mr854931bkh.7.1291138465676; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:34:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpo.poczta.interia.pl (smtpo.poczta.interia.pl [217.74.65.206]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 9si557881fax.13.2010.11.30.09.34.25; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:34:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jezuch@interia.pl designates 217.74.65.206 as permitted sender) client-ip=217.74.65.206; Received: by smtpo.poczta.interia.pl (INTERIA.PL, from userid 502) id 0DDDD1A42E4E; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:34:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from zx-spectrum-1.localnet (c204.idd156.nettete.pl [77.79.204.156]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by poczta.interia.pl (INTERIA.PL) with ESMTPSA for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:34:18 +0100 (CET) From: Krzysztof Sobolewski Organization: Sobole To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Question about apparent inconsistency with "nixli". Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:41:35 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.36-hugepage; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <547f2fd5-c8a4-4dec-acee-97412386bf83@f20g2000prn.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1616154.lAj8WWCLnv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201011301841.35606.jezuch@interia.pl> X-Interia-Antivirus: OK X-EMID: 6a848acc X-Original-Sender: jezuch@interia.pl X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jezuch@interia.pl designates 217.74.65.206 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jezuch@interia.pl Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , --nextPart1616154.lAj8WWCLnv Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dnia wtorek, 30 listopada 2010 o 17:02:23 Luke Bergen napisa=C5=82(a): > In fact, I kind of wish that something less arbitrary in general had been= used for the gismu list. I'm also often surprised at the choice of "source" words in those 6 languag= es (or rather the two I know, or mostly know) for various gismu... What was= the algorithm for *that*? :) =2D-=20 Ecce Jezuch "Did I have the dream, or did the dream have me?" =2DN. Peart --nextPart1616154.lAj8WWCLnv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkz1N08ACgkQy0fq9RM+Txi/gwCgpxvdLqDgOqGuCSa/sJciGrNf QPgAnRQnjZcx2dtVbGlrHqCuzOg0SHVw =CRYj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1616154.lAj8WWCLnv--