From lojban+bncCICntNPQBRCupcPmBBoE1xJHmg@googlegroups.com Tue Nov 02 20:10:52 2010
Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCICntNPQBRCupcPmBBoE1xJHmg@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1PDTkN-00062K-PP; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 20:10:51 -0700
Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28sf246582gxk.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 20:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:mime-version
         :received:received:date:in-reply-to:x-ip:references:user-agent
         :x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help
         :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=gC0PvJYF832L03gInQxAWXuQ1U7hFba5OI1GUV+43tI=;
        b=yOWGlE2lTQPF16fOzR6EmvPWLlZX5DLPmuWYBCLfUFsM+rwU5bilN4Huw6/LTMG1Wb
         hrl9SbhF5CvgciRBCiznWsUwli+JjvAwvlSIfxPC/IInfD+qF18UDv6+p5d1AwTIN2VD
         peyIsrl1VrpEt+atFHNYIx80QAkowL9v3jlMs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:x-ip:references
         :user-agent:x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to
         :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        b=bqnwW+jEKTdl/IhyxgM8Vy+ZYsQ1a7HwqgSKTQaxEDNOoCjb8nD1fIfi+qo1XclOp/
         ImJ72Gv8vDALBifzc8RXZfmWCPekh/OlUVA7MqRx90AcChzEObgtXH6zLypK1GQJSSR/
         jA4vB7Px64/nI3Mh4OlIZl3GDuVdiC/gPXbTg=
Received: by 10.100.34.12 with SMTP id h12mr74137anh.75.1288753838371;
        Tue, 02 Nov 2010 20:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.100.22.18 with SMTP id 18ls235013anv.1.p; Tue, 02 Nov 2010
 20:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.101.200.33 with SMTP id c33mr69780anq.26.1288753837837; Tue,
 02 Nov 2010 20:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by c20g2000yqj.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 20:10:37
 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 20:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin0NuzRpoB6eM0h3=UhO14XiqjhgVUGJw33fp91@mail.gmail.com>
X-IP: 166.135.161.109
References: <AANLkTim5TLeoepSkQNppVIO4DE2DTeejb-d7EaQacK55@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTimZcYofPlMbpAzNLu8oSjnGcSMWG7qtgCDFxjzI@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTikKyQ91QKzqdn13hcvtyu9xYx_EHDZoPecEP4Nu@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTilK5_ODgQGJ7C89GbXib0c07RiP7x4o69f4qNGs@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTimlvkuwgeroUytXRiQvsSCUyAc0AkfukYlyfz7h@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTimUi7NRQtDu0xb7qywfvJN5JraRDct0kcDP-09Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <23ac6112-9897-4424-8c42-d23ccac97e30@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <AANLkTin0NuzRpoB6eM0h3=UhO14XiqjhgVUGJw33fp91@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.12)
 Gecko/20101027 Ubuntu/10.04 (lucid) Firefox/3.6.12,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <07e58fba-2c56-4abc-96f1-f966153e6ea5@c20g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
Subject: [lojban] Re: The place structure of {selma'o}
From: Lindar <lindarthebard@yahoo.com>
To: lojban <lojban@googlegroups.com>
X-Original-Sender: lindarthebard@yahoo.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

> My point is, {selbroda} can be a subclass of {se broda}, but cannot be
> a superclass. I am feeling like {selkei} doesn't violate this rule,
> and is therefore OK. On the other hand, {selma'o} if including BRIVLA
> and CMENE does violate it, and is therefore NOT OK.

While perhaps slightly contested, I offer you {nikyge'u} in return.
What think you?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.