From lojban+bncCML0xpmUARDT8N7oBBoEe29P-w@googlegroups.com Sun Dec 26 13:49:20 2010 Received: from mail-px0-f189.google.com ([209.85.212.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PWySr-0002T8-1q; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:49:20 -0800 Received: by pxi19 with SMTP id 19sf3320501pxi.16 for ; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:49:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=jpF/m3RlDJbI336t87XF0owbT1Rup/bt3c8j6Tjv1Qw=; b=JC/zYoT0O2JsPBWfukZ+roYVGog7/eCScG2pnlWMCsGDCPn2mQmUCBp/I2OlkHauvl x9fEfPMdRCkwT2OWjJbFT3qrpG+cTsIS6Tw1O6fgPohuhmIM+crkGdaaQYix9RqvvwCB vAOOzIvVwOf5Qa1J5hlZuLrdsLsA0fgkuRx70= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=GvW5kZRkO5hsGMRuMCyKQ+SG1WuctfkOAKUTt7QFassKuojTq/CffjN8Cee+abc7+7 Awy/k3Q8aWAsc+qED3hExW9msbDa13HNcZ2UdXojtvSQmbZKeTcP4CaDYIsaEQ+8AjPx fyA5nTguMQi/SGYcq6bCyxHgVNzA+Yw/Y7HQ4= Received: by 10.143.20.28 with SMTP id x28mr571826wfi.61.1293400147017; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:49:07 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.142.121.31 with SMTP id t31ls12057661wfc.3.p; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:49:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.142.21 with SMTP id p21mr3472516wfd.10.1293400145755; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:49:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.142.21 with SMTP id p21mr3472515wfd.10.1293400145716; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:49:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pw0-f53.google.com (mail-pw0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id m3si12290663wfl.1.2010.12.26.13.49.04; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:49:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.53; Received: by pwj6 with SMTP id 6so1325045pwj.26 for ; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:49:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.14.8 with SMTP id 8mr9455641wfn.145.1293400144558; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:49:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.103.17 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:49:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 16:49:04 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Tanru automatically forming From: Ian Johnson To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: blindbravado@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=blindbravado@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd174922b3b870498573076 --000e0cd174922b3b870498573076 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Granted, we're basically small jbove'a in IRC in terms of proficiency, but = I see tanru relatively infrequently in conversation on IRC. They're not especially uncommon, but I'd estimate 3 out of 5 sentences at least don't have a single one. Increased precision tends to come about with NOI, {be}, NU, and sometimes lujvo, rather than tanru. mu'o mi'e .latros. On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Oleksii Melnyk wrote: > > > 2010/12/26 Ian Johnson > >> The simplest bridi would have no tanru >> > > I've meant "real life simple bridi", which IMO would contain a lot of the= m, > because "le broda" would be too generic/dull/whatever for our taste. =ABl= o > gerku cu klama=BB is improbably simple, it would be =ABlo broda gerku cu = klama=BB > most of the time, unless we'll breed a sort of Spartan culture. > > > -- > mu'o mi'e lex > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --000e0cd174922b3b870498573076 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Granted, we're basically small jbove'a in IRC in terms of proficien= cy, but I see tanru relatively infrequently in conversation on IRC. They= 9;re not especially uncommon, but I'd estimate 3 out of 5 sentences at = least don't have a single one. Increased precision tends to come about = with NOI, {be}, NU, and sometimes lujvo, rather than tanru.

mu'o mi'e .latros.

On Sun, De= c 26, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Oleksii Melnyk <lamelnyk@gmail.com> wrote:


2010/12/26 Ian Johnson= <blindbravado@gmail.com>
The simplest bridi would have no tanru

I've m= eant "real life simple bridi", which IMO would contain a lot of t= hem, because "le broda" would be too generic/dull/whatever for ou= r taste. =ABlo gerku cu klama=BB is improbably simple, it would be =ABlo br= oda gerku cu klama=BB most of the time, unless we'll breed a sort of Sp= artan culture.


--
mu'o mi'e lex

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--000e0cd174922b3b870498573076--