From lojban+bncCMW93IevGRDGhejoBBoEaqDasQ@googlegroups.com Tue Dec 28 07:31:37 2010 Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PXbWK-0000wn-AM; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 07:31:37 -0800 Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19sf9994637gxk.16 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 07:31:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received :sender:reply-to:received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=xao31pcJBz9ZHCmgOeIFp4dClAyY/T1OQ0KKt9Hl5jM=; b=EiE//YFO3mUYV7+aShRY8b+V5ysWhBLg47w0N0Jz7JaOudSeuFTavB8WUXA6ft8TBE vQM20Qqlg8RlwMi2ibFK7aPmtrR+RQRVHoWfHf4mSAXEkTRdi58r8GRTrQU3Vy2sMC1s IOSPTo8a8ss87vLgHtSqd/Ipw20CXV60L48vY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; b=Iluhdzw094L/s7FaRx3MnSrAQTaxZUB9JbeoGFDkwFRbox+yqnv4QJec3WFPvTJDlz aqIF6VbzOKpbuu272CoAcSxsNnGnotg7cNjfCtY9OuoQkZlu8xdqp5xkS8uwZ8C3hfRr 8UgVrNzbKYkYrSXuqS0ifpowNXPgXxe0PtEag= Received: by 10.147.170.4 with SMTP id x4mr889476yao.15.1293550278240; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 07:31:18 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.151.17.13 with SMTP id u13ls7618733ybi.1.p; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 07:31:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.147.83.8 with SMTP id k8mr2751137yal.21.1293550277679; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 07:31:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.55.15 with SMTP id d15mr10331263wfa.30.1293549873269; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 07:24:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.55.15 with SMTP id d15mr10331258wfa.30.1293549872805; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 07:24:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-px0-f182.google.com (mail-px0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id n6si14488070wfl.7.2010.12.28.07.24.32; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 07:24:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of matthew@matthew-walton.co.uk designates 209.85.212.182 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.182; Received: by pxi1 with SMTP id 1so1851501pxi.13 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 07:24:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.217.16 with SMTP id p16mr11094654wfg.279.1293549872608; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 07:24:32 -0800 (PST) Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.142.89.17 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 07:24:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101220023210.GP24603@digitalkingdom.org> <20101220032552.GA47011@alice.local> <20101220034848.GT24603@digitalkingdom.org> <20101228145628.GE8001@digitalkingdom.org> Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 15:24:32 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [lojban-announcements] Help with CLLv1.1 needed. Mostly does *NOT* require Lojban skill. From: Matthew Walton To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: matthew@matthew-walton.co.uk X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of matthew@matthew-walton.co.uk designates 209.85.212.182 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=matthew@matthew-walton.co.uk Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 28 December 2010 15:19, Matthew Walton wrote: > On 28 December 2010 14:56, Robin Lee Powell wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 02:34:13PM +0000, Matthew Walton wrote: >>> Question: the TODO file says "Make sure the interlinear-gloss bits >>> look right". What's 'right'? >> >> Look at section 5.1 and 5.2. >> >>> What I think I'm seeing is an inconsistency in when something's >>> marked up as .. or .., but I'm not sure >>> what it's supposed to be or indeed if that's even what you mean us >>> to do here. >> >> jbo should wrap Lojban bits that should be glossed per-word. >> gloss should wrap the English per-word gloss. >> en should wrap the plain/colloquial English. >> >> If you don't have at least two parts of those, change >> to , because it isn't one. > > Thanks Robin. Onward to markup perfection! Oh look I have another question about this. This is probably my fault for choosing Chapter 3, but: bisydja BI,sy,dja BI,syd,ja That's not really a Lojban + gloss + English set, is it? It's a progressive examination of pronunciation. Are we happy to overload like this, should it be changed to something else, or should I just ignore it for now? (or a fourth option I haven't thought of, of course). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.