From lojban+bncCNTPpI2KGxCDivToBBoE2JPWYA@googlegroups.com Thu Dec 30 14:17:55 2010 Received: from mail-qw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PYQog-0003GS-9A; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:17:55 -0800 Received: by qwd6 with SMTP id 6sf27773994qwd.16 for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:17:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:x-authority-analysis:x-cloudmark-score :x-originating-ip:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; bh=cubb7KcsO1vl6rWCEvRuynHm1KDfgDAvVmXBBooT+Mc=; b=EKP4M7l71GiO4pOXmtnkpJUqlaDZf8BydoooNEAfW2OAc1Wgm+Rtx/CuvuVmokt/pZ PancY3dtw0RVREPlV/Pi/GYmpqCviPaBqjqdTr8+JWjjZedN9jFEAsNGRVIK9fRWGgXc b5s77RUvxSJQ00LqxYv0xXEs8gP6BdxUpEg94= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authority-analysis:x-cloudmark-score :x-originating-ip:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; b=cD8wTiZVvjiiVgFCuS+M2jGNk2Y27j/LMAwNUFI5FHnvFjZG4EevN0TVStOKFKZRwP qS5PqwXXW3pXYFXVjl2GatbB+YYkCW59B/vRSpp3mI6fJuXdSYkJzytcNccMdlBGAOVf kPKueYHtsq6eFKRhumCUFloHddfWD9kOZ4eFc= Received: by 10.229.20.81 with SMTP id e17mr1908334qcb.18.1293747459180; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:17:39 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.229.80.196 with SMTP id u4ls4826624qck.0.p; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:17:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.19.199 with SMTP id c7mr1803556qcb.17.1293747458563; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:17:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.19.199 with SMTP id c7mr1803555qcb.17.1293747458545; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:17:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.121]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id j6si3050343qcu.10.2010.12.30.14.17.38; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:17:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.121 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=75.180.132.121; X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=pepdxKapwHuwCZNFD5uob2wvham6E+RljB0uXw08FdQ= c=1 sm=0 a=wPDyFdB5xvgA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:17 a=KIiwUJyajmxm_mO4uTgA:9 a=5P0e58U4QP4IiS46ks1Dt-JFOnQA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 75.176.118.168 Received: from [75.176.118.168] ([75.176.118.168:56243] helo=chausie) by cdptpa-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id B1/D1-19545-1050D1D4; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 22:17:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6705F82F for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 17:17:33 -0500 (EST) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] GIhA question Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 17:17:29 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201012301717.31348.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.121 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 30 December 2010 16:19:48 Jameson Orndorff wrote: > When you say something like {.i mi tavla gi'e citka}, is it safe to > assume that you are in fact saying {.i mi tavla zo'e zo'e zo'e gi'e > citka zo'e} and NOT where {zo'e}s are shared amongst both bridi? It > seems like obviously so, but I want to make sure. Yes. If you say "mi tavla je citka", then you're talking to what you're eating; if you say "mi tavla gi'e citka", you're talking to someone and eating something, not implying that they are the same. You can also put a sumti between "tavla" and "gi'e". You can identify x3 of "tavla" with x2 of "citka" by saying "mi tavla je setese citka do lo vanjba". Pierre -- li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.