From lojban+bncCL-Ey5qiChCk7tvnBBoEr5SqCQ@googlegroups.com Wed Dec 01 17:32:34 2010 Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PNy2B-000857-Lu; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:32:34 -0800 Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19sf6306131gxk.16 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:32:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=d9/XBWOiusFsxYcJ53C3cx9rMbqKgHs01rMQyJHcaB4=; b=VzwORKdE4Wz0KCR1l5Ba6gsQ8YtejpVrrrQRG9O21RUjyA1df1YDYDkAUwkxp+U8fc aF5mDIvHa/EbZATySjp/YN+YA0zvy4t2SOB4+MhKw2Axe+pge5Vrz2hiEEfFCCrH1HHW /eQy0wrRQ8tGNm5UguBL5m9zfQXgYgfycYVnc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=pBGZ/8OCssNiphUl2IFQ10pQOgtJm56r6AdHmUql3Kng+6Xe2l2JJERRv2NkLTRuZm 3+QpTXvsKxk7zEBXs4Cb9OyJt1YcJZP73QFBy8WztarRx1Ys3hureI298Ya2Y1EfD6qK 1xeke+4sDp65UFc7Csmm5CSwSBiTz9Tl6W4yk= Received: by 10.151.62.39 with SMTP id p39mr23353ybk.7.1291253540839; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:32:20 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.151.135.18 with SMTP id m18ls4916520ybn.1.p; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:32:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.212.16 with SMTP id k16mr64901ybg.39.1291253539727; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:32:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.212.16 with SMTP id k16mr64899ybg.39.1291253539685; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:32:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-gy0-f181.google.com (mail-gy0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id g34si33851ybc.11.2010.12.01.17.32.18; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:32:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of craigbdaniel@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.181 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.181; Received: by gyh3 with SMTP id 3so4252239gyh.12 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:32:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.145.134 with SMTP id f6mr2770125icv.153.1291253538441; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:32:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.196.198 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:32:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <659354.26852.qm@web81304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <604115.16202.qm@web81305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <752705.36302.qm@web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <822423.65423.qm@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <605319.19000.qm@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <433664.89554.qm@web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <906301.34622.qm@web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <306693.13766.qm@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <144450.19864.qm@web81308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <132939.86626.qm@web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <886986.39526.qm@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <476795.46183.qm@web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <435142.54831.qm@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <194237.46033.qm@web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 20:32:18 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Time for the perenial other-centric-.ui conversation From: Craig Daniel To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: craigbdaniel@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of craigbdaniel@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.181 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=craigbdaniel@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 6:01 PM, John E Clifford > wrote: >> >> Why not, given that it is built on 'ie'? >> Gee, I hope someone can do better than xorxes. > > > Because of the bloody definition of the bloody word {pei}. > > UIdai is used to indicate another's UI-state, why do you have such a problem > with UIpei, which is used to ask about it? UIdai is *not* used to indicate another's UI-state, but the speaker's UI-state and the fact that it is empathetic in nature. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.