From lojban+bncCIycn8S8DhCp4d7nBBoEoYv1_w@googlegroups.com Thu Dec 02 06:44:13 2010 Received: from mail-qw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1POAOC-0000rM-Ad; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 06:44:13 -0800 Received: by qwf7 with SMTP id 7sf15369370qwf.16 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 06:43:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PM5VaKUVfRHI7n/8hrfKbD0zl0oQ1EtW9bMkhwQBkIE=; b=gOYNLxWuKSwQjcLKpP3AEDMb7fOBOL+kSU7NecdgyDXlmff093lRyoyGXTcSraZWDu iRJVW0NfYVf4WD1oUK6UIEBN2QzkBodTlB+iAPQO0/AH/m8DkaCT+sdiBdPPtjcjFjYK 6/U1/GlY7IShl6/6xcXQcAarb4HS077AuHn2s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=3fhmmlYjjlCG2dF7EG08HAuoV4H9p6Sj/unuQ+LbbuhBKrp2fVeMgab2BWTrJ1Ii26 PVi9f1fVMQJiWP41cYbefvKvLo419+vBPmniTbsa5K6WGkPC54Lo806LMjxwIyUS0o5V ObtJ1XbszCc1hDLAdgKfzbhHwqZ/GJwDpcG4Q= Received: by 10.229.2.160 with SMTP id 32mr20137qcj.41.1291301034005; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 06:43:54 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.229.80.196 with SMTP id u4ls2976597qck.0.p; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 06:43:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.190.10 with SMTP id dg10mr16841qcb.20.1291301026732; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 06:43:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.190.10 with SMTP id dg10mr16840qcb.20.1291301026705; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 06:43:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vw0-f45.google.com (mail-vw0-f45.google.com [209.85.212.45]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id ey28si136431qcb.7.2010.12.02.06.43.45; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 06:43:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.45 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.45; Received: by mail-vw0-f45.google.com with SMTP id 12so3316081vws.32 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 06:43:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.214.76 with SMTP id gz12mr91802qcb.196.1291301025304; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 06:43:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.176.69 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 06:43:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <659354.26852.qm@web81304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <604115.16202.qm@web81305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <752705.36302.qm@web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <822423.65423.qm@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <605319.19000.qm@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <433664.89554.qm@web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <34382.7549.qm@web81303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 09:43:43 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Time for the perenial other-centric-.ui conversation From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.45 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010/11/29 Jorge Llamb=EDas : > Maybe a UI for "I'm here!" wouldn't be unreasonable. If there was such > a UI, we could use it to ask, although it would probably make more > sense as a COI. Let's say "bu'au" was such a COI. Then "bu'au pei > " would be a good way to do a roll call. > Gee, I hate* to add to a thread that already has more than a 100 messages on it, especially for what is mostly a tongue-in-cheek comment, but what's wrong with "u'aro'ose'ise'o"? --gejyspa *(well, obviously, I don't hate it, because if I did, I would avoid doing i= t...) --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.