From lojban+bncCK30vq5WEN6tl-kEGgRAU1P2@googlegroups.com Thu Jan 06 06:57:11 2011 Received: from mail-pw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ParH0-0005al-Rn; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 06:57:11 -0800 Received: by pwi2 with SMTP id 2sf5115984pwi.16 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 06:57:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; bh=np1kB7n8FAnlP4IeY2qKLeIywSR7ip3og8NgiYYeN3w=; b=LpYcq//FwWVvlmfnEmq6EOLX+dLRgMesC+B4obzI3wBN+U7vyyZvef7oX2C3j2Ygs7 MuscKyfkCLn4AmMyJqgURNhI4X7w0yUVzviWBeDnAZch66tBFr+30imECDUJTW4b9IDi zJ8GEI1Mpr1DFfy944L7YVXTaqkupiDr5ND2w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; b=S1D6kczl0KNrdF0WReZ8Je1q1GSUZrB7z+vce+cimI9oGnwBWIybCdhGJZod5diB2a xLSJ1KSmzOu8D1Rj9Z9xvDP5C10TdwfZ6QhiREL03Hetm/d3ooQUz/RMJCtET0M3243I hPPUUr68GjFdvNKemdVBiw2f6+6e1pfjKp/pQ= Received: by 10.142.249.18 with SMTP id w18mr68026wfh.8.1294325470844; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 06:51:10 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.142.97.18 with SMTP id u18ls1158292wfb.2.p; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 06:51:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.177.1 with SMTP id z1mr850167wfe.2.1294325469386; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 06:51:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.177.1 with SMTP id z1mr850166wfe.2.1294325469341; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 06:51:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org (digitalkingdom.org [173.13.139.234]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p40si1058235wfc.2.2011.01.06.06.51.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 06 Jan 2011 06:51:09 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.234 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.234; Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ParBE-0005W3-7N for lojban@googlegroups.com; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 06:51:08 -0800 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 06:51:08 -0800 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] *-no-SA-handling in PEG grammar Message-ID: <20110106145108.GS17534@digitalkingdom.org> References: <20110106141506.GA27424@134.sub-75-208-112.myvzw.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110106141506.GA27424@134.sub-75-208-112.myvzw.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:15:06AM -0700, .alyn.post. wrote: > There are several productions of the form *-no-SA-handling, > (BAI-no-SA-handling, BAhE-no-SA-handling, &c) in the Lojban PEG > grammar. > > I can't see that any of these productions are referenced by other > productions in the grammar. What are these rules? It seems that > removing them would have no effect on the parser. These appear to be a side effect of how SA handling used to work; diffs back to the version in question attached. I've updated the source to remove them. > Similarly, I can't see that CMAVO-clause is referenced anywhere. Commentend out, with a note-to-self. -Robin -- http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.