From lojban+bncCLr6ktCfBBDRs5fpBBoEeoYu1w@googlegroups.com Thu Jan 06 07:03:54 2011 Received: from mail-yi0-f61.google.com ([209.85.218.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ParNW-00060R-Kx; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:03:54 -0800 Received: by mail-yi0-f61.google.com with SMTP id 27sf10189016yia.16 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:03:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:received:received:date:from:to :subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version :in-reply-to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition; bh=NIVzNwfeP+oe/8ko6q6ZRnA/BDRpuaGontfa8In561M=; b=WRrB4Z+63AslU46uyGwaaTIRi39ivKnuGixa+TJ0CZJ98h8mBzQ+2/TJu0rUCwyZN4 ouuY3cuQdKz8wCU85mO5veAghHIiVNcvoVNOJ28I9GaKkvmhGKkG8g6Gci7k4QolOuJq iSXKzueAawVrdpVwkB12l0AHOg9/mfdvsNHCs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition; b=v5HXtXvz+mVai2WxGqKh1SirITffF+rNUqmPmY9Hb+W64M3pq2Zfw2B46LmHn/Wgkc SpxK6198iKdg1MiDzr7f2Gu1zwKbAFaKy+dLHd4Ib+PmXteS5TLG0bbqfQKyRQ0ZGI9L SJsZzjXPqEEV01yt6Wfh2rllcSxwEn/mPNgvQ= Received: by 10.236.110.41 with SMTP id t29mr895715yhg.16.1294326225223; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:03:45 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.100.26.21 with SMTP id 21ls3358680anz.2.p; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:03:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.152.17 with SMTP id z17mr1215823and.44.1294326224759; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:03:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.152.17 with SMTP id z17mr1215822and.44.1294326224740; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:03:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id c18si10192941anc.6.2011.01.06.07.03.44; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:03:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.160.182 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of alanpost@sunflowerriver.org) client-ip=209.85.160.182; Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so6954863gyf.27 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:03:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.177.15 with SMTP id z15mr10021688ybe.24.1294326224228; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:03:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from sunflowerriver.org (173-10-243-253-Albuquerque.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.10.243.253]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u5sm15424758yba.22.2011.01.06.07.03.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:03:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 08:03:31 -0700 From: ".alyn.post." To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] *-no-SA-handling in PEG grammar Message-ID: <20110106150330.GA27505@alice.local> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com References: <20110106141506.GA27424@134.sub-75-208-112.myvzw.com> <20110106145108.GS17534@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110106145108.GS17534@digitalkingdom.org> X-Original-Sender: alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.160.182 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of alanpost@sunflowerriver.org) smtp.mail=alanpost@sunflowerriver.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 06:51:08AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:15:06AM -0700, .alyn.post. wrote: > > There are several productions of the form *-no-SA-handling, > > (BAI-no-SA-handling, BAhE-no-SA-handling, &c) in the Lojban PEG > > grammar. > > > > I can't see that any of these productions are referenced by other > > productions in the grammar. What are these rules? It seems that > > removing them would have no effect on the parser. > > These appear to be a side effect of how SA handling used to work; > diffs back to the version in question attached. I've updated the > source to remove them. > The diffs appear to have been removed from this e-mail after you setn it. Will you send them again? -Alan -- .i ko djuno fi le do sevzi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.