From lojban+bncCLr6ktCfBBDjxJfpBBoEqtKzQw@googlegroups.com Thu Jan 06 07:40:36 2011 Received: from mail-yx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.213.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Parx0-0000lr-4u; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:40:35 -0800 Received: by yxn35 with SMTP id 35sf15522257yxn.16 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:40:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:received:received:date:from:to :subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version :in-reply-to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition; bh=2HHE8cqInm9wUSuWpjz5LWXimSLQzfJLXJ6kgutllJU=; b=YFiqrOySbgCiBMY2RGSgKq9y7pItPX7PvRkoFNEzEkYh2SMPx2N1V5qySnSMtYqYc7 ch7AOuCvuBvwOGPHQIPQhi7gkPxtMpJ9VUCws5ffHRD6urlPDKw04sg2AXq8lO6efq4u pA9n5FRKQgYkX1kHQitvcQ+xsD5s2lebmrNH8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition; b=TPHIe00vFr/kI7nqqHEtU1fmS8SAMKDnvllNIXCUnFIH3FLm2eDPKGsxZIHqLmmMk1 OP6daa7dGbaHD0atZQbxuwbfwZdCKDBn0/bZhtpEs4fv76pB2afABpcDkA0Www0KPCp3 fpihLt4BKqqJEMYsGTh/oYxcHqw72BqRZUp2k= Received: by 10.100.34.17 with SMTP id h17mr159754anh.64.1294328419622; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:40:19 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.100.55.28 with SMTP id d28ls3362587ana.6.p; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:40:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.109.20 with SMTP id h20mr3696091anc.58.1294328418701; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:40:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.109.20 with SMTP id h20mr3696090anc.58.1294328418679; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:40:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-gy0-f179.google.com (mail-gy0-f179.google.com [209.85.160.179]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 28si10204073anv.0.2011.01.06.07.40.18; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:40:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.160.179 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of alanpost@sunflowerriver.org) client-ip=209.85.160.179; Received: by gyg8 with SMTP id 8so7722261gyg.24 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:40:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.91.10.24 with SMTP id n24mr2090290agi.162.1294328418408; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:40:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from sunflowerriver.org (173-10-243-253-Albuquerque.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.10.243.253]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 17sm16551331anx.13.2011.01.06.07.40.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:40:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 08:40:13 -0700 From: ".alyn.post." To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] *-no-SA-handling in PEG grammar Message-ID: <20110106154013.GB27505@alice.local> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com References: <20110106141506.GA27424@134.sub-75-208-112.myvzw.com> <20110106145108.GS17534@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110106145108.GS17534@digitalkingdom.org> X-Original-Sender: alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.160.179 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of alanpost@sunflowerriver.org) smtp.mail=alanpost@sunflowerriver.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 06:51:08AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:15:06AM -0700, .alyn.post. wrote: > > There are several productions of the form *-no-SA-handling, > > (BAI-no-SA-handling, BAhE-no-SA-handling, &c) in the Lojban PEG > > grammar. > > > > I can't see that any of these productions are referenced by other > > productions in the grammar. What are these rules? It seems that > > removing them would have no effect on the parser. > > These appear to be a side effect of how SA handling used to work; > diffs back to the version in question attached. I've updated the > source to remove them. > After doing the same against my tree, I have discovered that the following rules are in the same class (unreferenced productions), but don't match the pattern '*-no-SA-handling': pre-zei-bu-no-SA zei-clause-no-SA bu-clause-no-SA BU-clause-no-SA BU-pre-no-SA LEhU-clause-no-SA LEhU-pre-no-SA ZEI-clause-no-SA ZEI-pre-no-SA I believe they can be removed too. -Alan -- .i ko djuno fi le do sevzi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.